ReviewTranslational pediatrics2021
Ethical issues after pre-natal diagnosis.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ethical dilemmas in continuing pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMC medical ethics · 2025Pooled it
- Prenatal Ultrasound Screening and Women's Expectations: an Original Study.Materia socio-medica · 2022Article
- Cyclopia, a newborn with a single eye, a rare but lethal congenital anomaly: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2021Article
- The current state of prenatal detection of genetic conditions in congenital heart defects.Translational pediatrics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following pre-natal diagnosis of congenital heart defect parents and family face a dramatic psychological crisis because of their state of shock, contradictory information available on potential outcomes, limited availability of time for decisions and for autonomous choices. Counselling the parents can present additional difficulties due to influence of education, cultural and religious background, individual cognitive and emotional processes, and cross-cultural patient care is a challenging issue for the caregivers. Type and quality of messages transmitted by the caregivers determine the counselling process, with the risk of misunderstandings particularly high with reduced available evidence, or with different outcomes accordingly with the various alternatives of treatment. Since the introduction of pre-natal diagnosis for congenital abnormality, interruption of pregnancy became available on these grounds in many Western countries, and the numbers of babies born with congenital heart defects has declined significantly despite concomitant advances in treatment options and outcomes. Detailed and objective information, with all available options, should be provided after pre-natal diagnosis of congenital heart defect. One of the major achievements of pediatric medicine in the last 50 years is the increased understanding of the pathogenetic causal mechanisms of congenital heart defects as well as its treatment. For congenital heart defects the progress of surgical treatments allowed a huge proportion of these children to reach adult life with a decent quality of life and social integration. Therefore, must be a considerable concern that universal pre-natal diagnosis widespread pregnancy interruption may obviate those gains. A reduction in the post-natal population undergoing treatment may have a significantly deleterious effect on the expertise of the caregivers, producing a reduction in outcome quality. With all respect for the parental choices and the obligations to follow the national laws, is necessary to remark that our society is genuinely ambivalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.