Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34584840›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2021

Modeling combined ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging: Simulations aiding device development and artificial intelligence.

Sumit Agrawal, Thaarakh Suresh, Ankit Garikipati, Ajay Dangi, Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review of Deep Learning Approaches for Interleaved Photoacoustic and Ultrasound (PAUS) Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Photoacoustic imaging for microcirculation.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sumit AgrawalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Thaarakh SureshDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Ankit GarikipatiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Ajay DangiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Sri-Rajasekhar KothapalliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Funding

Transrectal Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imagining of Prostate and Molecular ImagR00EB017729 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI KOTHAPALLI, SRI RAJASEKHAR · 2017 to 2019
$723k
A portable photoacoustic imager for diagnosing vascular diseasesR21EB030370 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI KOTHAPALLI, SRI RAJASEKHAR · 2020 to 2022
$348k
NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB017729NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB030370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combined ultrasound and photoacoustic (USPA) imaging has attracted several pre-clinical and clinical applications due to its ability to simultaneously display structural, functional, and molecular information of deep biological tissue in real time. However, the depth and wavelength dependent optical attenuation and the unknown optical and acoustic heterogeneities limit the USPA imaging performance in deep tissue regions. Novel instrumentation, image reconstruction, and artificial intelligence (AI) methods are currently being investigated to overcome these limitations and improve the USPA image quality. Effective implementation of these approaches requires a reliable USPA simulation tool capable of generating US based anatomical and PA based molecular contrasts of deep biological tissue. Here, we developed a hybrid USPA simulation platform by integrating finite element models of light (NIRFast) and ultrasound (k-Wave) propagations for co-simulation of B-mode US and PA images. The platform allows optimization of different design parameters for USPA devices, such as the aperture size and frequency of both light and ultrasound detector arrays. For designing tissue-realistic digital phantoms, a dictionary-based function has been added to k-Wave to generate various levels of ultrasound speckle contrast. The feasibility of modeling US imaging combined with optical fluence dependent multispectral PA imaging is demonstrated using homogeneous as well as heterogeneous tissue phantoms mimicking human organs (e.g., prostate and finger). In addition, we also demonstrate the potential of the simulation platform to generate large scale application-specific training and test datasets for AI enhanced USPA imaging. The complete USPA simulation codes together with the supplementary user guides have been posted to an open-source repository (https://github.com/KothapalliLabPSU/US-PA_simulation_codes).

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningk-WaveNIRFastPhotoacoustic imagingSimulationsSpectral unmixingUltrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID34584840
PMCPMC8452892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.