ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021
Breast Reconstruction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Impact on Plastic Surgery Training: A 9-year National Analysis of Case Log Disruptions and Recovery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Effect of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Delivery of Breast Reconstructive Services and Outcomes.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer surgeries in a Canadian population.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Retrospective Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Breast Cancer Care.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Acceptance of outpatient enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS©) protocols for implant-based breast reconstruction nudged on by the COVID-19 pandemic.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2024Article
- Decreasing length of stay in breast reconstruction patients: A national analysis of 2019-2020.Journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Value of Ambulatory Modified Radical Mastectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Patient Experience and Clinical Outcomes after Same-day Outpatient Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction Protocol during the Global Pandemic.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Did the National Ban on Bacitracin Irrigation Affect Infection Rates in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction? An Analysis of a National Database.Clinical breast cancer · 2023Article
- Outcomes of the same-day discharge following mastectomy before, during and after COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alloplastic breast reconstruction: An analysis of national outcomes.Journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Effects of COVID-19 on mastectomy and breast reconstruction rates: A national surgical sample.Journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- The COVID-19 Pandemic Consequences on Microsurgical Reconstructions: A Single Center's Shift of Indications.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- Canadian Expert Opinion on Breast Reconstruction Access: Strategies to Optimize Care during COVID-19.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges for breast reconstruction. Many professional organizations initially placed restrictions on breast reconstruction, leading surgeons to conceive innovative protocols for offering breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the current evidence on breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide guidance for surgeons facing future crises.
methodsThe MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies (1) describing implant and autologous breast reconstruction following mastectomy and (2) occurring during or pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic.
resultsOf the 1347 studies identified, 26 were included. Studies discussed type of reconstruction (18, 69%), complications (11, 42%), timing of reconstruction (10, 38%), protocols (10, 38%), COVID-19 screening (7, 27%), and length of hospital stay (7, 27%). The type of reconstruction varied depending on the stage of the pandemic: early on, autologous breast reconstruction was halted to preserve resources, but was later resumed. Within implant-based reconstruction, direct-to-implant was favored over serial tissue expansion. Several protocols were developed, with many emphasizing multidisciplinary collaborations for patient selection, use of specialized measures to reduce risk of COVID-19 transmission, and optimization of same-day discharge. Complication rates following breast reconstruction were similar to pre-pandemic rates.
conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has forever changed the landscape of breast reconstruction by raising important questions about delivery of care, cost, and resource utilization. The findings of this review may inform surgeons as they plan for similar future crises or strive for improved patient care and efficacy even during nonpandemic times.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.