Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34584734›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2021

Deep learning for improving non-destructive grain mapping in 3D.

H Fang, E Hovad, Y Zhang, L K H Clemmensen, B Kjaer Ersbøll, D Juul Jensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H FangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-5276
E HovadDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-3522
Y ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6901-0309
L K H ClemmensenDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-5798
B Kjaer ErsbøllDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1262-7890
D Juul JensenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-6602
Technical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory X-ray diffraction contrast tomography (LabDCT) is a novel imaging technique for non-destructive 3D characterization of grain structures. An accurate grain reconstruction critically relies on precise segmentation of diffraction spots in the LabDCT images. The conventional method utilizing various filters generally satisfies segmentation of sharp spots in the images, thereby serving as a standard routine, but it also very often leads to over or under segmentation of spots, especially those with low signal-to-noise ratios and/or small sizes. The standard routine also requires a fine tuning of the filtering parameters. To overcome these challenges, a deep learning neural network is presented to efficiently and accurately clean the background noise, thereby easing the spot segmentation. The deep learning network is first trained with input images, synthesized using a forward simulation model for LabDCT in combination with a generic approach to extract features of experimental backgrounds. Then, the network is applied to remove the background noise from experimental images measured under different geometrical conditions for different samples. Comparisons of both processed images and grain reconstructions show that the deep learning method outperforms the standard routine, demonstrating significantly better grain mapping.

Indexed as

background noisecomputer visiondeep learninggrain mappingLabDCTspot segmentationtomographyX-ray diffraction

Identifiers

PMID34584734
PMCPMC8420763
OpenAlexW3178300167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.