ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2021
Epidemiology And Outcomes Of Radiator Burns At A High Throughput Burns Centre.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indoor radiator burns can cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in vulnerable patients. However, the epidemiology and clinical outcomes are poorly characterized. A retrospective study of all radiator burns referred to a tertiary regional burns centre between 2013-2019 was conducted. Four hundred and forty-seven patients (median age 25.6 years, male:female ratio 1.4:1) were referred; 109 (24%) admitted, 201 (45%) managed in outpatients and 137 (31%) managed locally. The incidence of burns leading to referral was 0.65/100,000/year, but increased annually. Contact burns consisted of 99.6%. Age distribution was bimodal: <5 years (43%), >65 years (27%), although all ages were affected. Median TBSA was 0.75% (0.1-11.5%), but 79% had injuries <2%. Childhood burns were predominantly superficial dermal grab injuries, usually manageable as outpatients. Elderly patients had larger burns usually secondary to falls or impaired sensorium, and were more likely to die (p<0.05). Burns due to impaired sensorium were deeper and more likely to require surgery (p<0.05). Sixty-three (14%) patients required surgery. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1%. Age was the only significant predictor of mortality. This study quantifies the epidemiology and outcomes of a growing problem. It identifies at risk populations (extremes of age), and important features of the clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34584499PMC8396153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.