Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34584279›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2021

Comparison of supra-inguinal fascia iliaca versus pericapsular nerve block for ease of positioning during spinal anaesthesia: A randomised double-blinded trial.

Ashok Jadon, Khalid Mohsin, Rajendra K Sahoo, Swastika Chakraborty, Neelam Sinha, Apoorva Bakshi

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05377541 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of PENG Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in the Postoperative Pain Control of Hip Capsular Fracture

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorConsorci Sanitari de TerrassaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled88ConditionsHip FracturesArmsSurgical treatment of femur fracture
NCT05505604 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Hip Fracture Analgesia in Emergency Department Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2022 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsFemoral Neck Fractures, Intertrochanteric FracturesArmsPENG, FICB
NCT07130006 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures: a Factorial Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of SplitRan2025 to 2026Enrolled256ConditionsFractures, Hip, Femoral Neck Fractures, Intertrochanteric Fractures, Subtrochanteric FracturesArmsPENG and LFCN peripheral nerve blocks with spinal anesthesia, FN and LFCN peripheral nerve blocks with spinal anesthesia, FIC peripheral nerve block with spinal anesthesia, Fentanyl (IV) with spinal anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashok JadonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief Service, Tata Motors Hospital, Telco Colony, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Khalid MohsinDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief Service, Tata Motors Hospital, Telco Colony, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Rajendra K SahooDepartment of Pain and Palliative Care Medicine and Anaesthesiology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Swastika ChakrabortyDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief Service, Tata Motors Hospital, Telco Colony, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Neelam SinhaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief Service, Tata Motors Hospital, Telco Colony, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Apoorva BakshiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief Service, Tata Motors Hospital, Telco Colony, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Tata Motors (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsRegional analgesic techniques such as supra-inguinal fascia-iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block have been found to be effective in providing good pain relief in hip-fracture patients. However, comparative studies between PENG and S-FICB are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of S-FICB and PENG block and assess their efficacy in optimal patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia.

methodsA prospective randomised double-blind study was conducted in 66 patients randomly divided to receive either S-FICB or PENG block under ultrasound guidance. Primary outcome measures were numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at rest and on passive 15° limb lifting, 30 minutes after the block and ease of spinal positioning. The secondary outcome measures were NRS over 24 hours, amount of tramadol used (number of rescue doses), patients' satisfaction and block-related complications. The results were analysed using statistical software (MedCalc version 19.2.1). Continuous and categorical data were analysed using appropriate statistical analysis and

resultsPost-block, the NRS score decreased significantly in PENG and S-FICB groups at rest and movement (

conclusionPENG block provided better pain relief and ease of positing during SA in patients with fractured hip scheduled for hip surgery.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiafasciafemoral nervehip fracturesnerve blockpain managementspinal

Identifiers

PMID34584279
PMCPMC8445209
OpenAlexW3199180296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.