ArticleEye (London, England)2022
Type one macular neovascularization in central serous chorioretinopathy: Short-term response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Choroidal neovascularization as a trigger for central serous chorioretinopathy.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Choroidal Response to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections in Treatment-Naïve Macular Neovascularization Secondary to Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Clinical Landscape of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Germany: Retina.net CSC Registry Report Number 1.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the short-term effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment on type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) secondary to central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) and to identify potential predictive factors for treatment response using multimodal imaging.
methodsRetrospective, multicentre study in CSCR patients with MNV detected by OCT-angiography and treated with anti-VEGF injections. Clinical and multimodal imaging data before and after anti-VEGF injections was reviewed. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between the change in central macular thickness (CMT) after anti-VEGF therapy and other factors.
resultsForty patients were included. One month after receiving a mean number of 2.7 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections, visual acuity increased significantly from 0.46 ± 0.3 logMAR at baseline to 0.38 ± 0.4 logMAR (p = 0.04). The CMT and foveal serous retinal detachment (SRD) decreased significantly from 330 ± 81.9 µm at baseline to 261.7 ± 63.1 µm after treatment (p < 0.001) and from 145.1 ± 98.8 µm at baseline to 52.6 ± 71.3 µm (p < 0.001), respectively. Subretinal fluid and/or intraretinal fluid were still present in 18 eyes (45%) one month after treatment. In the multivariate analysis, a higher SRD height was associated with a greater CMT change (p = 0.002) and a lower CMT change with the presence of subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) (p = 0.04).
conclusionFluid resorption was incomplete in about half of the patients with MNV secondary to CSCR after anti-VEGF injections. Shallower SRD or the presence of SHRM were predictors of poor response to anti-VEGF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.