Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34584212›Full record

ReviewModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

Genetic profiling and biomarkers in peripheral T-cell lymphomas: current role in the diagnostic work-up.

Francisco Vega, Catalina Amador, Amy Chadburn, Eric D Hsi, Graham Slack, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Andrew L Feldman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco VegaDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. fvega@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-452X
Catalina AmadorDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, USA.
Amy ChadburnDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9499-8638
Eric D HsiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8623-4067
Graham SlackDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
L Jeffrey MedeirosDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6577-8006
Andrew L FeldmanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-4808
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCornell University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous, and usually aggressive, group of mature T-cell neoplasms with overlapping clinical, morphologic and immunologic features. A large subset of these neoplasms remains unclassifiable with current diagnostic methods ("not otherwise specified"). Genetic profiling and other molecular tools have emerged as widely applied and transformative technologies for discerning the biology of lymphomas and other hematopoietic neoplasms. Although the application of these technologies to peripheral T-cell lymphomas has lagged behind B-cell lymphomas and other cancers, molecular profiling has provided novel prognostic and diagnostic markers as well as an opportunity to understand the biologic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of these neoplasms. Some biomarkers are more prevalent in specific T-cell lymphoma subsets and are being used currently in the diagnosis and/or risk stratification of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Other biomarkers, while promising, need to be validated in larger clinical studies. In this review, we present a summary of our current understanding of the molecular profiles of the major types of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We particularly focus on the use of biomarkers, including those that can be detected by conventional immunohistochemical studies and those that contribute to the diagnosis, classification, or risk stratification of these neoplasms.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, T-Cell, PeripheralBiomarkersHumansPrognosisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34584212
OpenAlexW3203268620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.