Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34584175›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Delay discounting and under-valuing of recent information predict poorer adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Alex Lloyd, Ryan McKay, Todd K Hartman, Benjamin T Vincent, Jamie Murphy, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Liat Levita, Kate Bennett, Orla McBride, Anton P Martinez and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Individuals with adverse childhood experiences explore less and underweight reward feedback.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alex LloydDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, TW20 0EX, England. alex.lloyd120@gmail.com.
Ryan McKayDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, TW20 0EX, England.
Todd K HartmanUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Benjamin T VincentUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland.
Jamie MurphyUniversity of Ulster, Ulster, Northern Ireland.
Jilly Gibson-MillerUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Liat LevitaUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Kate BennettUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, England.
Orla McBrideUniversity of Ulster, Ulster, Northern Ireland.
Anton P MartinezUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Thomas V A StocksUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Frédérique VallièresTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Philip HylandNational University of Ireland, Maynooth, Republic of Ireland.
Thanos KaratziasEdinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Sarah ButterUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Mark ShevlinUniversity of Ulster, Ulster, Northern Ireland.
Richard P BentallUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Liam MasonUniversity College London, London, England.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/V004379/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about unprecedented global changes in individual and collective behaviour. To reduce the spread of the virus, public health bodies have promoted social distancing measures while attempting to mitigate their mental health consequences. The current study aimed to identify cognitive predictors of social distancing adherence and mental health symptoms, using computational models derived from delay discounting (the preference for smaller, immediate rewards over larger, delayed rewards) and patch foraging (the ability to trade-off between exploiting a known resource and exploring an unknown one). In a representative sample of the UK population (N = 442), we find that steeper delay discounting predicted poorer adherence to social distancing measures and greater sensitivity to reward magnitude during delay discounting predicted higher levels of anxiety symptoms. Furthermore, under-valuing recently sampled information during foraging independently predicted greater violation of lockdown guidance. Our results suggest that those who show greater discounting of delayed rewards struggle to maintain social distancing. Further, those who adapt faster to new information are better equipped to change their behaviour in response to public health measures. These findings can inform interventions that seek to increase compliance with social distancing measures whilst minimising negative repercussions for mental health.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePhysical DistancingAnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Delay DiscountingFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMotivationPandemicsPublic HealthUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34584175
PMCPMC8479072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.