ReviewJournal of tissue viability2021
Skin damage prevention in the prone ventilated critically ill patient: A comprehensive review and gap analysis (PRONEtect study).
Review in Journal of tissue viability, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05238870 (Prevention of Skin Damage in the Patient in Prone Position), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prevention of Skin Damage in the Patient in Prone Position: Development of the "ProneTection" Education and Training Package and Study of Implementation Conditions in an Intensive Care Setting in Belgium and Sweden.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparison of the effects of Temporin atomizable mucosal liquid dressing vs. routine skin care on wound healing in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Adverse Events during Prone Positioning of Patients with COVID-19 during a Surge in Hospitalizations-Results of an Observational Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Physiotherapy management for COVID-19 in the acute hospital setting and beyond: an update to clinical practice recommendations.Journal of physiotherapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVentilating critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position is a life-saving strategy, but it is associated with adverse consequences such as skin damage.
aimTo identify, review and evaluate international proning and skin care guidelines and make an inventory of commonly used equipment and training resources.
designA gap analysis methodology was applied.
methods1) Comprehensive search and evaluation of proning and skin care guidelines, 2) extensive search and listing equipment and educational resources, and 3) international consultation with 11 experts (8 countries). DATA SOURCES: A variety of sources researched through July 2021 were used to identify relevant literature: (1) scientific literature databases and clinical trials registries, (2) intensive care and wound care associations, (3) healthcare organisations, (4) guideline development organisations, and (5) the Google search engine. Eleven international experts reviewed the literature and provided insights in two, 2-h online sessions.
findingsThe search yielded 24 guidelines. One clinical practice guideline had high methodological quality. Twenty-five devices/equipment and sixteen teaching materials were identified and discussed with the expert panel. The gap analysis identified a lack of concise, accessible, evidence-based guidelines and educational materials of short duration.
conclusionThis analysis forms the basis for designing a competency-based education and training intervention for an interdisciplinary team caring for the skin of critically ill patients in the prone position. IMPACT: The results can assist the multidisciplinary team to review their current protocol for prone positioning. This is a first step in developing a training package for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.