ArticlePhysiotherapy2021
Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight.
Article in Physiotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07112508 (PRISM), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PRISM: The PRimary Care Individual Social Norms MSK Data Dashboard: a Cluster Randomised Feasibility Trial in Clinician Management of Musculoskeletal Patients.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient satisfaction with advanced practice physiotherapy internationally: A systematic mixed studies review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Patient, family member and healthcare professionals' experiences of physiotherapy airway clearance techniques during hospital admission: a scoping review.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- First Contact Physiotherapists (FCPs) Referral Practices to Rheumatology: A Scoping Review of the Evidence Base.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Survey of Current Physiotherapy Practice in Cyprus.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Experiences of physiotherapists audited by South African medical funding schemes.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2026Article
- The Role of Physiotherapists in Multi-professional Primary Care: Lessons for Japan.Physical therapy research · 2026Review
- Plantar Heel Pain Management: A Survey of UK Registered Healthcare Professionals.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
- What does collaborative healthcare for people with musculoskeletal-related conditions look like? A scoping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Musculoskeletal First Contact Practitioners Undertaking a Higher Education Training Route-A Qualitative Exploration of Clinical Supervision Experiences.Musculoskeletal care · 2025Article
- Exploration of Rapid Adaptation of First Contact Physiotherapy Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Three-Phase Sequential Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Task shifting for musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care: a qualitative interview study of general practitioners and specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapists.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Experiences of the Management of Uncertainty Amongst Musculoskeletal First Contact Practitioners Working in Primary Care.Musculoskeletal care · 2025Article
- Challenges and enablers to implementation of the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme in primary care: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- Enhancing access to primary care is critical to the future of an equitable health service: using process visualisation to understand the impact of national policy in the UK.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- 'Making every contact count' with patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a qualitative exploration of acceptability to physiotherapists.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Understanding Experiences of First Contact Physiotherapy in General Practice: A Realist Qualitative Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFirst Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) is a primary care model where expert musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapists undertake the first patient consultation, to enhance MSK-patient care and free-up GP capacity. The authors report the qualitative findings from the FCP National Evaluation (Phase 3) which evaluated the FCP model against pre-agreed success criteria. DESIGN AND
settingA mixed-methods 24-month service evaluation involving FCP sites across England.
methodsData were collected at 2 time points, year 1 and year 2. Data were collected using individual interviews and focus groups, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Participants were recruited from all stakeholder groups; patients, physiotherapists, general practitioners and administration staff.
resultsA total of 6 sites were recruited over both rounds of data collection demonstrating a wide range of service models. Thirty-nine participants were recruited including fourteen patients. All six qualitative success criteria were met. GPs' discourse reflected confidence in the FCP service and competence of the FCPs. Patient discourse reflected self-efficacy and confidence in self-management techniques and reported FCP as a positive experience. FCPs saw providing advice about work related issues as integral to their role and patient discourse reflected perceived benefit from the advice offered. Staff discourse reflected a positive experience of working with, and in, the FCP services.
conclusionAhead of the planned scale-up of the FCP primary care model across the UK, this evaluation provides useful insights and recommendations to facilitate successful FCP implementation in terms of patient outcome and experience, and staff experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.