Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34583774›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2021

A new scoring system and clinical algorithm for the management of suspected foreign body aspiration in children: a retrospective cohort study.

Nader A Fasseeh, Osama A Elagamy, Alaa H Gaafar, Heba M Reyad, Mohamed S Abougabal, Doaa A Heiba, Ahmad Kantar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pediatric Foreign Body Aspiration Over 2 Decades: Clinical Features, Diagnostic Challenges, and Complications Associated With Delayed Bronchoscopy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nader A FasseehPediatric Respiratory and Allergy Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Osama A ElagamyDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
Alaa H GaafarDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Heba M ReyadDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. h.reyad_00@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8974-7930
Mohamed S AbougabalPediatric Respiratory and Allergy Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Doaa A HeibaPediatric Respiratory and Allergy Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ahmad KantarPediatric Asthma and Cough Center, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi, Bergamo, Italy.
Alexandria University · EGKafrelsheikh University · EGIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCases of foreign body aspiration in children may be encountered in emergency departments. A suggestive history is important in diagnosing aspirated foreign body owing to the difficulty in making a diagnosis on the basis of an abnormal physical examination or chest radiography alone. The aim of this study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the presenting symptoms, physical examination, and radiologic findings as predictors of foreign body aspiration in children. In addition, a feasible simple algorithm with a scoring system was generated to indicate bronchoscopic investigation.

methodsIn a retrospective cohort, medical records of patients aged less than 16 years with suspected foreign body aspiration who underwent flexible or rigid bronchoscopy were included. Data including age, sex, symptoms, physical examination findings, radiological features, nature and location of the foreign body, and outcome of the bronchoscopy were collected, and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was employed for prediction of foreign body aspiration.

resultsA total of 203 children were included, and the model showed excellent discrimination power for positive foreign body aspiration (area under the curve = 0.911) with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 86.2, 90.6, and 76.6%, respectively. The total weighted risk score at a cut-off > 2 showed a significant good power of discrimination (area under the curve = 0.879), with a sensitivity of 79.9% and specificity of 84.4%. Accordingly, a clinical algorithm was recommended.

conclusionsThe proposed scoring system and clinical algorithm might help in decision making with regard to the need and type of bronchoscopy in children presenting with potential foreign body aspiration. However, further prospective multicenter studies should be conducted to validate this scoring system.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentBronchoscopyChildChild, PreschoolClinical Decision-MakingCohort StudiesFemaleForeign BodiesHumansMaleRespiratory AspirationRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBronchoscopyChildrenClinical algorithmForeign body aspiration

Identifiers

PMID34583774
PMCPMC8480080
OpenAlexW3202631165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.