Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34583727›Full record

ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

Bench to bedside radiosensitizer development strategy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Charlotte Degorre, Philip Tofilon, Kevin Camphausen, Peter Mathen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte DegorreRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bldg. 10, Rm B2-3500, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Philip TofilonRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bldg. 10, Rm B2-3500, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Kevin CamphausenRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bldg. 10, Rm B2-3500, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Peter MathenRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bldg. 10, Rm B2-3500, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. peter.mathen@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-120X
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain malignancy and carries with it a poor prognosis. New agents are urgently needed, however nearly all Phase III trials of GBM patients of the past 25 years have failed to demonstrate improvement in outcomes. In 2019, the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory Committee (CTAC) Glioblastoma Working Group (GBM WG) identified 5 broad areas of research thought to be important in the development of new herapeutics for GBM. Among those was optimizing radioresponse for GBM in situ. One such strategy to increase radiation efficacy is the addition of a radiosensitizer to improve the therapeutic ratio by enhancing tumor sensitivity while ideally having minimal to no effect on normal tissue. Historically the majority of trials using radiosensitizers have been unsuccessful, but they provide important guidance in what is required to develop agents more efficiently. Improved target selection is essential for a drug to provide maximal benefit, and once that target is identified it must be validated through pre-clinical studies. Careful selection of appropriate in vitro and in vivo models to demonstrate increased radiosensitivity and suitable bioavailability are then necessary to prove that a drug warrants advancement to clinical investigation. Once investigational agents are validated pre-clinically, patient trials require consistency both in terms of planning study design as well as reporting efficacy and toxicity in order to assess the potential benefit of the drug. Through this paper we hope to outline strategies for developing effective radiosensitizers against GBM using as models the examples of XPO1 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors developed from our own lab.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicExportin 1 ProteinGlioblastomaHumansKaryopherinsNeoplastic Stem CellsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearValproic AcidExportin 1 ProteinKaryopherinsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearValproic AcidGlioblastomaPre-clinical/clinical studiesRadiosensitizers

Identifiers

PMID34583727
PMCPMC8480070
OpenAlexW3202425094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.