ArticleBMC oral health2021
Diagnostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing temporomandibular disorders: a retrospective chart review.
Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Region-Specific Attention-Enhanced U-Net: Architectural Optimization for Small-Target and Weak-Boundary Segmentation in TMJ MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- An Accurate Kinematic Analysis with Clinical Convenience for Decomposing Mandibular Movement into Translational and Rotational Components: A Preliminary Proof-of-Concept Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint Low Agreement with Clinical Diagnosis in Asymptomatic Females.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in distinguishing temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
methodsA total of 684 patients with TMD were included in the study. Diagnosis for TMD was conducted according to the international criteria. Two professional radiologists were selected for professional training, and the Kappa values were compared for the diagnosis results to determine the consistency of the diagnosis. Then MRI images of these 684 patients were analyzed and the diagnosis results were obtained.
resultsMRI can be used for the diagnosis of TMD. There were significantly more females (518 cases) than males (166 cases) with TMD; Disc displacement with/without reduction is more common in the youth group, with the majority aged 20-30 years. The highest incidence of temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis is in the 60-year-old age group, followed by the 70-year-old age group.
conclusionsBilateral temporomandibular joint MRI can clearly show their changes; there are significantly more female with TMD than male; osteoarthritis has a significant correlation with age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.