Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34583581›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

From temporal network data to the dynamics of social relationships.

Valeria Gelardi, Didier Le Bail, Alain Barrat, Nicolas Claidiere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Promoting collective cooperation through temporal interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valeria GelardiAix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6541-2012
Didier Le BailAix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France.
Alain BarratAix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-269X
Nicolas ClaidiereAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPC, FED3C, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4472-6597

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Networks are well-established representations of social systems, and temporal networks are widely used to study their dynamics. However, going from temporal network data (i.e. a stream of interactions between individuals) to a representation of the social group's evolution remains a challenge. Indeed, the temporal network at any specific time contains only the interactions taking place at that time and aggregating on successive time-windows also has important limitations. Here, we present a new framework to study the dynamic evolution of social networks based on the idea that social relationships are interdependent: as the time we can invest in social relationships is limited, reinforcing a relationship with someone is done at the expense of our relationships with others. We implement this interdependence in a parsimonious two-parameter model and apply it to several human and non-human primates' datasets to demonstrate that this model detects even small and short perturbations of the networks that cannot be detected using the standard technique of successive aggregated networks. Our model solves a long-standing problem by providing a simple and natural way to describe the dynamic evolution of social networks, with far-reaching consequences for the study of social networks and social evolution.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSocial NetworkingAnimalsprimate behavioursocial evolutionsocial relationshipstemporal networks

Identifiers

PMID34583581
PMCPMC8479335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.