ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Addressing Sexual Problems in German Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding access to sexual and reproductive health in general practice using an adapted Candidacy Framework: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Pooled it
- Sexuality, a Fundamental Care Need-Theoretical and Clinical Considerations, a Discursive Paper.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Review
- Digital intervention mylovia improves sexual functioning in women with sexual dysfunction in randomized controlled trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The association between depression, perceived stress, and sexual function among adults attending primary health care services.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Diagnostic Interview for Sexual Dysfunctions in Women in a Symptom-Reporting Sample.Assessment · 2025Article
- Women's sexual health improvement: sexual quality of life and pelvic floor muscle assessment in asymptomatic women.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although general practitioners (GPs) are often the first contact for patients' sexual issues, little is known about how German GPs approach, diagnose, and treat sexual problems and disorders. Therefore, the present qualitative study explores approaches and management of sexual health issues used by GPs. The sample included 16 GPs from Kiel and surroundings and Sachsen-Anhalt. The in-depth, semi-structured interviews were coded according to the qualitative content analysis by Mayring using MAXQDA. The results revealed 5 main themes, 2 of which are explored in more detail in relation to the study objective (2 and 4): (1) sexual issues that arise in general practice, (2) addressing sexuality, (3) influencing factors in doctor-patient communication about sexuality, (4) diagnosing and treating sexual dysfunctions, and (5) changes in the approach to sexuality over time. Most GPs did not routinely ask their patients about sexual problems. Common barriers included lack of time, suspected embarrassment on both sides, and fear of offending patients. Almost all GPs tended to diagnose sexual problems individually adapted to patients' issues, not following a standardized approach. Medication was offered as the main treatment for sexual problems. For complex disorders, most GPs lack sexual medicine knowledge, and they requested a better range of training courses in sexual medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.