Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34583198›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2021

Evaluation of a quasi-passive biarticular prosthesis to replicate gastrocnemius function in transtibial amputee gait.

Andrea M Willson, Chris A Richburg, Anthony J Anderson, Brittney C Muir, Joseph Czerniecki, Katherine M Steele, Patrick M Aubin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhanced gastrocnemius-mimicking lower limb powered exoskeleton robot.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  2. Design and Evaluation of a Knee Flexion Assistance Exoskeleton for People with Transtibial Amputation.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2022
    Article
  3. A robotic emulator for the systematic exploration of transtibial biarticular prosthesis designs.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea M WillsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), Seattle, WA, USA.
Chris A RichburgVA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), Seattle, WA, USA.
Anthony J AndersonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), Seattle, WA, USA.
Brittney C MuirDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph CzernieckiVA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katherine M SteeleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Patrick M AubinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: paubin@uw.edu.
University of Washington · US

Funding

RRD VA I50 RX002357RRD VA IK2 RX002130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lower limb amputees experience gait impairments, in part due to limitations of prosthetic limbs and the lack of a functioning biarticular gastrocnemius (GAS) muscle. Energy storing prosthetic feet restore the function of the soleus, but not GAS. We propose a transtibial prosthesis that implements a spring mechanism to replicate the GAS. A prototype Biarticular Prosthesis (BP) was tested on seven participants with unilateral transtibial amputation. Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill with motion capture, first using their prescribed prosthesis, then with the BP in four different spring stiffness conditions. A custom OpenSim musculoskeletal model, including the BP, was used to estimate kinematics, joint torques, and muscle forces. Kinematic symmetry was evaluated by comparing the amputated and intact angles of the ankle, knee, and hip. The BP knee and ankle torques were compared to the intact GAS. Finally, work done by the BP spring was calculated at the ankle and knee. There were no significant differences between conditions in kinematic symmetry, indicating that the BP performs similarly to prescribed prostheses. When comparing the BP torques to intact GAS, higher spring stiffness better approximated peak GAS torques, but those peaks occurred earlier in the gait cycle. The BP spring did positive work on the knee joint and negative work on the ankle joint, and this work increased as BP spring stiffness increased. The BP has the potential to improve amputee gait compensations associated with the lack of biarticular GAS function, which may reduce their walking effort and improve quality of life.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeWalkingAmputeeBiarticular prosthesisGaitPowerProsthesis

Identifiers

PMID34583198
PMCPMC9027914
OpenAlexW3201631659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.