Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582751›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2022

Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes and Cost by Phase of Care After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Rodrigo Zea-Vera, Christopher T Ryan, Jim Havelka, Stuart J Corr, Tom C Nguyen, Subhasis Chatterjee, Matthew J Wall, Joseph S Coselli, Todd K Rosengart, Ravi K Ghanta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rodrigo Zea-VeraMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Christopher T RyanMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Jim HavelkaInformAI, Houston, Texas.
Stuart J CorrDeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Tom C NguyenDivision of Adult Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Subhasis ChatterjeeMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.
Matthew J WallMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Joseph S CoselliMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.
Todd K RosengartMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas.
Ravi K GhantaMichael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: ravi.ghanta@bcm.edu.

Funding

Research Training Program in Cardiovascular SurgeryT32HL139430 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Todd K Rosengart · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL139430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning may enhance prediction of outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We sought to develop and validate a dynamic machine learning model to predict CABG outcomes at clinically relevant pre- and postoperative time points.

methodsThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) registry data elements from 2086 isolated CABG patients were divided into training and testing datasets and input into Extreme Gradient Boosting decision-tree machine learning algorithms. Two prediction models were developed based on data from preoperative (80 parameters) and postoperative (125 parameters) phases of care. Outcomes included operative mortality, major morbidity or mortality, high cost, and 30-day readmission. Machine learning and STS model performance were assessed using accuracy and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR).

resultsPreoperative machine learning models predicted mortality (accuracy, 98%; AUC-PR = 0.16; F1 = 0.24), major morbidity or mortality (accuracy, 75%; AUC-PR = 0.33; F1 = 0.42), high cost (accuracy, 83%; AUC-PR = 0.51; F1 = 0.52), and 30-day readmission (accuracy, 70%; AUC-PR = 0.47; F1 = 0.49) with high accuracy. Preoperative machine learning models performed similarly to the STS for prediction of mortality (STS AUC-PR = 0.11; P = .409) and outperformed STS for prediction of mortality or major morbidity (STS AUC-PR = 0.28; P < .001). Addition of intraoperative parameters further improved machine learning model performance for major morbidity or mortality (AUC-PR = 0.39; P < .01) and high cost (AUC-PR = 0.64; P < .01), with cross-clamp and bypass times emerging as important additive predictive parameters.

conclusionsMachine learning can predict mortality, major morbidity, high cost, and readmission after isolated CABG. Prediction based on the phase of care allows for dynamic risk assessment through the hospital course, which may benefit quality assessment and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansPatient ReadmissionRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34582751
PMCPMC9703607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.