ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2022
Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes and Cost by Phase of Care After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse-Led Large Language Model Chatbot for Predicting and Preventing Complications After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Evolution of coronary artery bypass grafting: conventional, minimally invasive, robotic, and hybrid revascularisation techniques.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Explainable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Surgical Necessity in Gastrointestinal Emergencies: A Multimodal Diagnostic Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An In-Hospital Mortality Risk Model for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Based on Machine Learning: Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Article
- Shaping the future of cardiac interventions and cardiac surgeries: The impact of virtual reality and artificial intelligence.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Review
- Comparison of scoring systems for bleeding in open cardiac surgery patients.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning in risk prediction of continuous renal replacement therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2024Article
- Machine learning in cardiac surgery: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Predictive value of gradient boosting decision trees for postoperative atelectasis complications in patients with pulmonary destruction.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality in hypertensive patients undergoing coronary revascularization surgery.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- An Improved CatBoost-Based Classification Model for Ecological Suitability of Blueberries.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine learning algorithms for predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Machine learning algorithms to predict major bleeding after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning may enhance prediction of outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We sought to develop and validate a dynamic machine learning model to predict CABG outcomes at clinically relevant pre- and postoperative time points.
methodsThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) registry data elements from 2086 isolated CABG patients were divided into training and testing datasets and input into Extreme Gradient Boosting decision-tree machine learning algorithms. Two prediction models were developed based on data from preoperative (80 parameters) and postoperative (125 parameters) phases of care. Outcomes included operative mortality, major morbidity or mortality, high cost, and 30-day readmission. Machine learning and STS model performance were assessed using accuracy and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR).
resultsPreoperative machine learning models predicted mortality (accuracy, 98%; AUC-PR = 0.16; F1 = 0.24), major morbidity or mortality (accuracy, 75%; AUC-PR = 0.33; F1 = 0.42), high cost (accuracy, 83%; AUC-PR = 0.51; F1 = 0.52), and 30-day readmission (accuracy, 70%; AUC-PR = 0.47; F1 = 0.49) with high accuracy. Preoperative machine learning models performed similarly to the STS for prediction of mortality (STS AUC-PR = 0.11; P = .409) and outperformed STS for prediction of mortality or major morbidity (STS AUC-PR = 0.28; P < .001). Addition of intraoperative parameters further improved machine learning model performance for major morbidity or mortality (AUC-PR = 0.39; P < .01) and high cost (AUC-PR = 0.64; P < .01), with cross-clamp and bypass times emerging as important additive predictive parameters.
conclusionsMachine learning can predict mortality, major morbidity, high cost, and readmission after isolated CABG. Prediction based on the phase of care allows for dynamic risk assessment through the hospital course, which may benefit quality assessment and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.