Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582734›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2021

Imprinting on time-structured acoustic stimuli in ducklings.

Tiago Monteiro, Tom Hart, Alex Kacelnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tiago MonteiroDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-8961
Tom HartDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4527-5046
Alex KacelnikDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3188-8255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filial imprinting is a dedicated learning process that lacks explicit reinforcement. The phenomenon itself is narrowly heritably canalized, but its content, the representation of the parental object, reflects the circumstances of the newborn. Imprinting has recently been shown to be even more subtle and complex than previously envisaged, since ducklings and chicks are now known to select and represent for later generalization abstract conceptual properties of the objects they perceive as neonates, including movement pattern, heterogeneity and inter-component relationships of same or different. Here, we investigate day-old Mallard (

Indexed as

DucksImprinting, PsychologicalAcousticsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsHumansInfant, NewbornLearningacoustic stimuliAnas platyrhynchosbehavioural timingfilial imprintinginnate pre-dispositionsmallard

Identifiers

PMID34582734
PMCPMC8478521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.