Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582601›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2021

Demographic risk assessment for a harvested species threatened by climate change: polar bears in the Chukchi Sea.

Eric V Regehr, Michael C Runge, Andrew Von Duyke, Ryan R Wilson, Lori Polasek, Karyn D Rode, Nathan J Hostetter, Sarah J Converse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Projecting the future of a threatened marine mammal in relation to climate warming.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  2. International consensus principles for the sustainable harvest of polar bears.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Demographic risk assessment for a harvested species threatened by climate change: polar bears in the Chukchi Sea.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eric V RegehrPolar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4487-3105
Michael C RungePatuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Laurel, Maryland, 20708, USA.
Andrew Von DuykeDepartment of Wildlife Management, North Slope Borough, Utqiaġvik, Alaska, 99723, USA.
Ryan R WilsonMarine Mammals Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, 99503, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-7771
Lori PolasekDivision of Wildlife Conservation, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Juneau, Alaska, 99802, USA.
Karyn D RodeAlaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.
Nathan J HostetterWashington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-2157
Sarah J ConverseWashington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences (SEFS) & School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences (SAFS), U.S. Geological Survey, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98105, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change threatens global biodiversity. Many species vulnerable to climate change are important to humans for nutritional, cultural, and economic reasons. Polar bears Ursus maritimus are threatened by sea-ice loss and represent a subsistence resource for Indigenous people. We applied a novel population modeling-management framework that is based on species life history and accounts for habitat loss to evaluate subsistence harvest for the Chukchi Sea (CS) polar bear subpopulation. Harvest strategies followed a state-dependent approach under which new data were used to update the harvest on a predetermined management interval. We found that a harvest strategy with a starting total harvest rate of 2.7% (˜85 bears/yr at current abundance), a 2:1 male-to-female ratio, and a 10-yr management interval would likely maintain subpopulation abundance above maximum net productivity level for the next 35 yr (approximately three polar bear generations), our primary criterion for sustainability. Plausible bounds on starting total harvest rate were 1.7-3.9%, where the range reflects uncertainty due to sampling variation, environmental variation, model selection, and differing levels of risk tolerance. The risk of undesired demographic outcomes (e.g., overharvest) was positively related to harvest rate, management interval, and projected declines in environmental carrying capacity; and negatively related to precision in population data. Results reflect several lines of evidence that the CS subpopulation has been productive in recent years, although it is uncertain how long this will last as sea-ice loss continues. Our methods provide a template for balancing trade-offs among protection, use, research investment, and other factors. Demographic risk assessment and state-dependent management will become increasingly important for harvested species, like polar bears, that exhibit spatiotemporal variation in their response to climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeUrsidaeAnimalsArctic RegionsDemographyFemaleIce CoverMaleRisk Assessmentclimate changedensity dependencehabitat lossharvestpolar bearrisk assessmentstate-dependent managementsubsistencesustainabilityUrsus maritimus

Identifiers

PMID34582601
PMCPMC9286533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.