Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582591›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Telepharmacy service experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Milena Kovačević, Milica Ćulafić, Sandra Vezmar Kovačević, Slavenka Borjanić, Branka Keleč, Branislava Miljković, Rada Amidžić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Milena KovačevićDepartment of Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-2957-7965
Milica ĆulafićDepartment of Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Sandra Vezmar KovačevićDepartment of Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Slavenka BorjanićPharmacy Moja apoteka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Branka KelečPharmacy ABC PHARM, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Branislava MiljkovićDepartment of Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Pharmacy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Rada AmidžićThe Pharmaceutical Society of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exerted a profound impact on health systems worldwide. Moreover, significant concerns were raised in terms of middle- and long-term consequences of postponing care in non-COVID patients. The primary aim of the study was to describe the remote pharmaceutical care service (telepharmacy) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Srpska (RS), Bosnia and Herzegovina. The secondary aim was to identify service users' needs and concerns and to describe community pharmacists' interventions. Ten community pharmacists were appointed by the Pharmaceutical Society of the RS to deliver telepharmacy services. After obtaining users' verbal permission, pharmacists documented issues discussed with them. The prospective data collection included the period from April 13 to May 21, 2020. Descriptive and statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (ver. 22). A total of 71 service users' charts were analyzed. Telepharmacy users were on average 61.31 ± 13.27 years of age, with almost equal gender distribution. Patients with chronic or acute/subacute conditions were predominant with a share of 84.5%. Chronic diseases were the main reason for searching pharmacists' consultation (74.6%), 7% had a complaint about worsening of a chronic condition, 9.9% reported only acute/subacute conditions as ambulatory conditions, whereas 15.5% asked information about coronavirus or COVID-19. The vast majority of patients' and users' needs were addressed by a pharmacist during counseling and only 15.5% of the patients required immediate referral to a doctor for refill/prescribing purposes. Remote pharmaceutical care service (telepharmacy) is deemed a convenient model in the RS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients and users presented with explicit and specific needs and concerns, both COVID- and non-COVID-related, which should not be neglected. Community pharmacists showed a high level of resilience and ability in addressing patients' needs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bosnia and HerzegovinaHumansPandemicsPharmacistsReferral and Consultationcommunity pharmacyCOVID-19pharmaceutical carepharmacistpublic healthtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34582591
PMCPMC8653267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.