Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582448›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2021

Effect of sunflower seed oil emollient therapy on newborn infant survival in Uttar Pradesh, India: A community-based, cluster randomized, open-label controlled trial.

Aarti Kumar, Shambhavi Mishra, Shambhavi Singh, Sana Ashraf, Peiyi Kan, Amit Kumar Ghosh, Alok Kumar, Raghav Krishna, David K Stevenson, Lu Tian and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05461404 (Emollient Therapy for Improved Survival and Growth of Very Low Birth Weight Infants in Zimbabwe), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05461404 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Emollient Therapy for Improved Survival and Growth of Very Low Birth Weight Infants in Zimbabwe

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled520ConditionsVery Low Birth Weight InfantArmsTopical Emollient Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Seeing beyond the obvious: pragmatic skin care guidance for infants 22-24 weeks gestational age.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Skin Care Supports Overall Well-Being.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Article
  9. Skin Care Practices in Indian Newborns and Infants: Current Scenario.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An Ayurvedic approach to sustaining and pampering the feet of healthcare workers.Journal of interprofessional education & practice · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Aarti KumarCommunity Empowerment Lab, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4331-3747
Shambhavi MishraCommunity Empowerment Lab, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7057-067X
Shambhavi SinghCommunity Empowerment Lab, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6942-6718
Sana AshrafCommunity Empowerment Lab, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3685-537X
Peiyi KanPrematurity Research Center, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5079-756X
Amit Kumar GhoshGovernment of India, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-3685
Alok KumarGovernment of Uttar Pradesh, India.
Raghav KrishnaCommunity Empowerment Lab, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
David K StevensonPrematurity Research Center, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Lu TianDepartment of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Peter M EliasDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Gary L DarmstadtPrematurity Research Center, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7522-5824
Vishwajeet KumarCommunity Empowerment Lab, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1084-7152
Shivgarh Emollient Research Group
Stanford University · USGovernment of Uttar Pradesh · INGovernment of India · INUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Lucknow · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitalized preterm infants with compromised skin barrier function treated topically with sunflower seed oil (SSO) have shown reductions in sepsis and neonatal mortality rate (NMR). Mustard oil and products commonly used in high-mortality settings may possibly harm skin barrier integrity and enhance risk of infection and mortality in newborn infants. We hypothesized that SSO therapy may reduce NMR in such settings. METHODS AND

findingsThis was a population-based, cluster randomized, controlled trial in 276 clusters in rural Uttar Pradesh, India. All newborn infants identified through population-based surveillance in the study clusters within 7 days of delivery were enrolled from November 2014 to October 2016. Exclusive, 3 times daily, gentle applications of 10 ml of SSO to newborn infants by families throughout the neonatal period were recommended in intervention clusters (n = 138 clusters); infants in comparison clusters (n = 138 clusters) received usual care, such as massage practice typically with mustard oil. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat with NMR and post-24-hour NMR as the primary outcomes. Secondary analysis included per-protocol analysis and subgroup analyses for NMR. Regression analysis was adjusted for caste, first-visit weight, delivery attendant, gravidity, maternal age, maternal education, sex of the infant, and multiple births. We enrolled 13,478 (52.2% male, mean weight: 2,575.0 grams ± standard deviation [SD] 521.0) and 13,109 (52.0% male, mean weight: 2,607.0 grams ± SD 509.0) newborn infants in the intervention and comparison clusters, respectively. We found no overall difference in NMR in the intervention versus the comparison clusters [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.11, p = 0.61]. Acceptance of SSO in the intervention arm was high at 89.3%, but adherence to exclusive applications of SSO was 30.4%. Per-protocol analysis showed a significant 58% (95% CI 42% to 69%, p < 0.01) reduction in mortality among infants in the intervention group who were treated exclusively with SSO as intended versus infants in the comparison group who received exclusive applications of mustard oil. A significant 52% (95% CI 12% to 74%, p = 0.02) reduction in NMR was observed in the subgroup of infants weighing ≤1,500 g (n = 589); there were no statistically significant differences in other prespecified subgroup comparisons by low birth weight (LBW), birthplace, and wealth. No severe adverse events (SAEs) were attributable to the intervention. The study was limited by inability to mask allocation to study workers or participants and by measurement of emollient use based on caregiver responses and not actual observation.

conclusionsIn this trial, we observed that promotion of SSO therapy universally for all newborn infants was not effective in reducing NMR. However, this result may not necessarily establish equivalence between SSO and mustard oil massage in light of our secondary findings. Mortality reduction in the subgroup of infants ≤1,500 g was consistent with previous hospital-based efficacy studies, potentially extending the applicability of emollient therapy in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants along the facility-community continuum. Further research is recommended to develop and evaluate therapeutic regimens and continuum of care delivery strategies for emollient therapy for newborn infants at highest risk of compromised skin barrier function.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN38965585 and Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2014/12/005282) with WHO UTN # U1111-1158-4665.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityAdministration, TopicalAdultCluster AnalysisEmollientsFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleMassageMustard PlantPlant OilsSkin CreamEmollientsmustard oilPlant OilsSunflower Oil

Identifiers

PMID34582448
PMCPMC8478176
OpenAlexW3203436600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.