Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582438›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2021

Evaluation of a community-based mobile video breastfeeding intervention in Khayelitsha, South Africa: The Philani MOVIE cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Maya Adam, Jamie Johnston, Nophiwe Job, Mithilesh Dronavalli, Ingrid Le Roux, Nokwanele Mbewu, Neliswa Mkunqwana, Mark Tomlinson, Shannon A McMahon, Amnesty E LeFevre and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03688217 (The Philani Mobile Video Intervention for Exclusive Breastfeeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03688217 nacompletednot on this map

The Philani Mobile Video Intervention for Exclusive Breastfeeding (MOVIE) Study: a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial of a Mobile Video Entertainment-education Intervention to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding in South Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles G. ProberRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,504ConditionsExclusive Breastfeeding, Infant Feeding PracticesArmsPhilani Intervention Model+MOVIE (PIM+M), Philani Intervention Model (PIM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Home visits for preterm/low birthweight infants in South Africa: Qualitative evidence synthesis.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Maya AdamDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-421X
Jamie JohnstonStanford Center for Health Education, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6992-5958
Nophiwe JobStanford Center for Health Education, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Mithilesh DronavalliUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5084-5023
Ingrid Le RouxThe Philani Maternal Child Health and Nutrition Trust, Khayelitsha, South Africa.
Nokwanele MbewuThe Philani Maternal Child Health and Nutrition Trust, Khayelitsha, South Africa.
Neliswa MkunqwanaDigital Medic, Stanford Center for Health Education, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mark TomlinsonInstitute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5846-3444
Shannon A McMahonHeidelberg University Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Amnesty E LeFevreJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-7240
Alain VandormaelHeidelberg University Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-0511
Kira-Leigh KuhnertStanford Center for Health Education, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Pooja SuriStanford Center for Health Education, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jennifer GatesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0616-704X
Bongekile MabasoSchool of Management Studies, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0675-9136
Aarti PorwalStanford Center for Health Education, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Charles ProberDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg University Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-4212

Funding

SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PREDICTORS OF PHYSICAL AND COGNITIVE FUNCTIONP01AG041710 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Julia Katherine Rohr · 2013 to 2026
$37.3M
New Methods for the design and evaluation of large HIV prevention interventionsR01AI112339 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGELMAN, DONNA L · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
Causal Pathways to population health impact of HIV antiretroviral treatmentR01HD084233 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2015 to 2021
$2.3M
Can HIV Hot-Spots be eradicated? An intervention to decrease HIV transmission to young women in rural KwaZulu-Natal South AfricaR01AI124389 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112339NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI124389NIA NIH HHS P01 AG041710NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084233Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn South Africa, breastfeeding promotion is a national health priority. Regular perinatal home visits by community health workers (CHWs) have helped promote exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in underresourced settings. Innovative, digital approaches including mobile video content have also shown promise, especially as access to mobile technology increases among CHWs. We measured the effects of an animated, mobile video series, the Philani MObile Video Intervention for Exclusive breastfeeding (MOVIE), delivered by a cadre of CHWs ("mentor mothers"). METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a stratified, cluster-randomized controlled trial from November 2018 to March 2020 in Khayelitsha, South Africa. The trial was conducted in collaboration with the Philani Maternal Child Health and Nutrition Trust, a nongovernmental community health organization. We quantified the effect of the MOVIE intervention on EBF at 1 and 5 months (primary outcomes), and on other infant feeding practices and maternal knowledge (secondary outcomes). We randomized 1,502 pregnant women in 84 clusters 1:1 to 2 study arms. Participants' median age was 26 years, 36.9% had completed secondary school, and 18.3% were employed. Mentor mothers in the video intervention arm provided standard-of-care counseling plus the MOVIE intervention; mentor mothers in the control arm provided standard of care only. Within the causal impact evaluation, we nested a mixed-methods performance evaluation measuring mentor mothers' time use and eliciting their subjective experiences through in-depth interviews. At both points of follow-up, we observed no statistically significant differences between the video intervention and the control arm with regard to EBF rates and other infant feeding practices [EBF in the last 24 hours at 1 month: RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.01, P = 0.091); EBF in the last 24 hours at 5 months: RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.04, P = 0.152)]. We observed a small, but significant improvement in maternal knowledge at the 1-month follow-up, but not at the 5-month follow-up. The interpretation of the results from this causal impact evaluation changes when we consider the results of the nested mixed-methods performance evaluation. The mean time spent per home visit was similar across study arms, but the intervention group spent approximately 40% of their visit time viewing videos. The absence of difference in effects on primary and secondary endpoints implies that, for the same time investment, the video intervention was as effective as face-to-face counseling with a mentor mother. The videos were also highly valued by mentor mothers and participants. Study limitations include a high loss to follow-up at 5 months after premature termination of the trial due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in mentor mother service demarcations.

conclusionsThis trial measured the effect of a video-based, mobile health (mHealth) intervention, delivered by CHWs during home visits in an underresourced setting. The videos replaced about two-fifths of CHWs' direct engagement time with participants in the intervention arm. The similar outcomes in the 2 study arms thus suggest that the videos were as effective as face-to-face counselling, when CHWs used them to replace a portion of that counselling. Where CHWs are scarce, mHealth video interventions could be a feasible and practical solution, supporting the delivery and scaling of community health promotion services.

trial registrationThe study and its outcomes were registered at clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT03688217) on September 27, 2018.

Indexed as

Audiovisual AidsBreast FeedingCommunity Health WorkersCounselingHouse CallsCommunity Health ServicesCOVID-19FemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaternal-Child Health ServicesMentorsMothersMotion PicturesOrganizationsPandemics

Identifiers

PMID34582438
PMCPMC8478218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.