Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582435›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Quantifying bacterial evolution in the wild: A birthday problem for Campylobacter lineages.

Jessica K Calland, Ben Pascoe, Sion C Bayliss, Evangelos Mourkas, Elvire Berthenet, Harry A Thorpe, Matthew D Hitchings, Edward J Feil, Jukka Corander, Martin J Blaser and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AcceleratingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Dynamics of dN/dS within recombining bacterial populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Fluoroquinolone-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evidence of potentialMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Jessica K CallandThe Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8888-0812
Ben PascoeThe Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6376-5121
Sion C BaylissThe Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-2002
Evangelos MourkasThe Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7411-4743
Elvire BerthenetFrench National Reference Center for Campylobacters and Helicobacters, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Harry A ThorpeThe Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5895-3232
Matthew D HitchingsInstitute of Life Sciences, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5527-4709
Edward J FeilThe Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-6744
Jukka CoranderDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7752-1942
Martin J BlaserCenter for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2447-2443
Daniel FalushCentre for Microbes, Development and Health, Institute Pasteur of Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Samuel K SheppardThe Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-3203
University of Bath · GBInstitut Pasteur of Shanghai · CNRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSwansea University · GBUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Genomic Epidemiology of Campylobacter to Improve Disease Control in Low and Middle Income CountriesR01AI158576 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KOSEK, MARGARET N · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P504750/1Medical Research Council MR/L015080/1Medical Research Council MR/M501608/1Medical Research Council MR/S009264/1Medical Research Council MR/T030062/1Medical Research Council MR/V001213/1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI158576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring molecular evolution in bacteria typically requires estimation of the rate at which nucleotide changes accumulate in strains sampled at different times that share a common ancestor. This approach has been useful for dating ecological and evolutionary events that coincide with the emergence of important lineages, such as outbreak strains and obligate human pathogens. However, in multi-host (niche) transmission scenarios, where the pathogen is essentially an opportunistic environmental organism, sampling is often sporadic and rarely reflects the overall population, particularly when concentrated on clinical isolates. This means that approaches that assume recent common ancestry are not applicable. Here we present a new approach to estimate the molecular clock rate in Campylobacter that draws on the popular probability conundrum known as the 'birthday problem'. Using large genomic datasets and comparative genomic approaches, we use isolate pairs that share recent common ancestry to estimate the rate of nucleotide change for the population. Identifying synonymous and non-synonymous nucleotide changes, both within and outside of recombined regions of the genome, we quantify clock-like diversification to estimate synonymous rates of nucleotide change for the common pathogenic bacteria Campylobacter coli (2.4 x 10-6 s/s/y) and Campylobacter jejuni (3.4 x 10-6 s/s/y). Finally, using estimated total rates of nucleotide change, we infer the number of effective lineages within the sample time frame-analogous to a shared birthday-and assess the rate of turnover of lineages in our sample set over short evolutionary timescales. This provides a generalizable approach to calibrating rates in populations of environmental bacteria and shows that multiple lineages are maintained, implying that large-scale clonal sweeps may take hundreds of years or more in these species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularCampylobacterGenes, BacterialGenetic VariationPhylogenySpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34582435
PMCPMC8500405
OpenAlexW3201697337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.