Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582415›Full record

Observational studyCritical care medicine2022

Beneficial Effect of Prone Positioning During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Akram M Zaaqoq, Adrian G Barnett, Matthew J Griffee, Graeme MacLaren, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Silver Heinsar, Jacky Y Suen, Gianluigi Li Bassi, John F Fraser, Heidi J Dalton and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Respiratory care · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Revue des maladies respiratoires actualites · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Akram M ZaaqoqDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Adrian G BarnettAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Matthew J GriffeeDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Graeme MacLarenCardiothoracic Intensive Care, National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jeffrey P JacobsCongenital Heart Center, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Silver HeinsarCritical Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jacky Y SuenCritical Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Gianluigi Li BassiCritical Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland and The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Heidi J DaltonDepartment of Pediatrics, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA.
Giles J PeekCongenital Heart Center, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium (COVID Critical)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study investigated the impact of prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory failure on the patient outcome.

designAn observational study of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. We used a multistate survival model to compare the outcomes of patients treated with or without prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which incorporates the dynamic nature of prone positioning and adjusts for potential confounders.

settingSeventy-two international institutions participating in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Critical Care Consortium international registry. PATIENTS: Coronavirus disease 2019 patients who were supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the study period.

interventionNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThere were 232 coronavirus disease 2019 patients at 72 participating institutions who were supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the study period from February 16, 2020, to October 31, 2020. Proning was used in 176 patients (76%) before initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and in 67 patients (29%) during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Survival to hospital discharge was 33% in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation prone group versus 22% in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation supine group. Prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.68).

conclusionsOur study highlights that prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for refractory coronavirus disease 2019-related acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with reduced mortality. Given the observational nature of the study, a randomized controlled trial of prone positioning on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationProne PositionSARS-CoV-2AdultCOVID-19FemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient PositioningProbabilityRespiratory Distress Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID34582415
PMCPMC8796833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.