Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34582072›Full record

ReviewReviews in medical virology2022

Pharmacological interventions to prevent Covid-19 disease: A rapid review.

Karen Cardwell, Eamon O Murchu, Paula Byrne, Natasha Broderick, Kieran A Walsh, Sinéad M O'Neill, Susan M Smith, Patricia Harrington, Máirín Ryan, Michelle O'Neill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biologics in COVID-19 So Far: Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karen CardwellHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5909-7439
Eamon O MurchuHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Paula ByrneHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Natasha BroderickHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Kieran A WalshHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4386-3012
Sinéad M O'NeillHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Susan M SmithDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Patricia HarringtonHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Máirín RyanHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Michelle O'NeillHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this rapid review was to determine the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions (excluding vaccines) to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) or reduce the severity of disease. A systematic search of published peer-reviewed articles and non-peer-reviewed pre-prints was undertaken from 1 January 2020 to 17 August 2021. Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and one non-RCT were included; three trials (two RCTs and one non-RCT) tested ivermectin with or without carrageenan. While all reported some potential protective effect of ivermectin, these trials had a high risk of bias and the certainty of evidence was deemed to be 'very low'. One RCT tested bamlanivimab compared to placebo and reported a significantly reduced incidence of Covid-19 in the intervention group; this trial had a low risk of bias however the certainty of evidence was deemed 'very low'. The fifth RCT tested casirivimab plus imdevimab versus placebo and reported that the combination of monoclonal antibodies significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, viral load, duration of symptomatic disease and the duration of a high viral load; this trial was deemed to have a low risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was 'low'. The designations 'low' and 'very low' regarding the certainty of evidence indicate that the estimate of effect is uncertain and therefore is unsuitable for informing decision-making. At the time of writing, there is insufficient high quality evidence to support the use of pharmacological interventions to prevent Covid-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingHumansIvermectinSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingbamlanivimabcasirivimabimdevimabIvermectincoronavirusCovid-19drug interventionpreventionprophylaxisSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34582072
PMCPMC8646848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.