ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021
Tissue Engineering in Skin Substitute.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Effects of acellular allogeneic dermis combined with autologous split-thickness skin grafts in repairing deep burn wounds in head, face, neck, and torso in children].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Article
- Harnessing Bioprinting Technologies for Diabetic Wound Regeneration.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- Current Biomaterials for Wound Healing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Application of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Gynaecology-A Current Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Frozen bean curd-inspired xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix with triple pretreatment approach of freeze-thaw, laser drilling and ADSCs pre-culture for promoting early vascularization and integration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- A Comparative Study on Two Types of Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix Sponges Prepared by Thermal Crosslinking and Thermal-Glutaraldehyde Crosslinking Matrix Microparticles.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thermal injuries may cause significant damage to large areas of the skin. Extensive and deep burn wounds require specialized therapy. The optimal method in the strategy of treating extensive, full thickness burns (III°) is the use of autologous split thickness skin grafts STSG (Busuioc et al. Rom J Morphol Embryol 4:1061-1067, 2012; Kitala D, Kawecki M, Klama-Baryła A, Łabuś W, Kraut M, Glik J, Ryszkiel I, Kawecki MP, Nowak M. Allogeneic vs. Autologous Skin Grafts in the Therapy of Patients with Burn Injuries: A Restrospective, Open-label Clinical Study with Pair Matching. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;25(5):923-929.; Glik J, Kawecki M, Kitala D, Klama-Baryła A, Łabuś W, Grabowski M, Durdzińska A, Nowak M, Misiuga M, Kasperczyk A. A new option for definitive burn wound closure - pair matching type of retrospective case-control study of hand burns in the hospitalized patients group in the Dr Stanislaw Sakiel Center for Burn Treatment between 2009 and 2015. Int Wound J. 2017 Feb 21. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12720 . [Epub ahead of print]; Prim et al. May 24Wound Repair Regen., 2017; Grossova et al. Mar 31Ann Burns Fire Disasters 30:5-8, 2017). The main limitation of that method is the inadequate amount of healthy, undamaged skin (donor sites), which could be harvested and used as a graft. Moreover, donor sites are an additional wounds that require analgesic therapy, leave scars during the healing process and they are highly susceptible to infection (1-6). It must be emphasized that in terms of the treatment of severe, deep and extensive burns, and there should be no doubt that the search for a biocompatible skin substitute that would be able to replace autologous STSG is an absolute priority. The above-mentioned necessitates the search for new treatment methods of severe burn wounds. Such methods could consider the preparation and application of bioengineered, natural skin substitutes. At present, as the clinical standard considered by the physicians may be use of available biological skin substitutes, e.g., human allogeneic skin, in vitro cultured skin cells, acellular dermal matrix ADM and revitalized ADMs, etc. (Busuioc et al. Rom J Morphol Embryol 4:1061-1067, 2012; Kitala D, Kawecki M, Klama-Baryła A, Łabuś W, Kraut M, Glik J, Ryszkiel I, Kawecki MP, Nowak M. Allogeneic vs. Autologous Skin Grafts in the Therapy of Patients with Burn Injuries: A Restrospective, Open-label Clinical Study with Pair Matching. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;25(5):923-929.; Glik J, Kawecki M, Kitala D, Klama-Baryła A, Łabuś W, Grabowski M, Durdzińska A, Nowak M, Misiuga M, Kasperczyk A. A new option for definitive burn wound closure - pair matching type of retrospective case-control study of hand burns in the hospitalised patients group in the Dr Stanislaw Sakiel Center for Burn Treatment between 2009 and 2015. Int Wound J. 2017 Feb 21. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12720 . [Epub ahead of print]; Prim et al. May 24Wound Repair Regen., 2017; Grossova et al. Mar 31Ann Burns Fire Disasters 30:5-8, 2017; Łabuś et al. FebJ Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 106:726-733, 2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
34582024What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.