Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34581989›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2021

The Clinical Application of Augmented Reality in Orthopaedics: Where Do We Stand?

J Hunter Matthews, John S Shields

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Hunter MatthewsWFBMC Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Watlington 4th Floor, 1 Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA. jmatthe@wakehealth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-8171
John S ShieldsWFBMC Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 329 NC-801 N, Bermuda Run, NC, 27006, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe surgical community is constantly working to improve accuracy and reproducibility in patient care, with the goal to improve patient outcomes and efficiency. One area of growing interest with potential to meet these goals is in the use of augmented reality (AR) in surgery. There is still a paucity of published research on the clinical benefits of AR over traditional techniques, but this article aims to present an update on the current state of AR within orthopaedics over the past 5 years. RECENT

findingsAR systems are being developed and studied for use in all areas of orthopaedics. Most recently published research has focused on the areas of fracture care, adult reconstruction, orthopaedic oncology, spine, and resident education. These studies have shown some promising results, particularly in surgical accuracy, decreased surgical time, and less radiation exposure. However, the majority of recently published research is still in the pre-clinical setting, with very few studies using living patients. AR supplementation in orthopaedic surgery has shown promising results in pre-clinical settings, with improvements in surgical accuracy and reproducibility, decreased operating times, and less radiation exposure. Most AR systems, however, are still not approved for clinical use. Further research is needed to validate the benefits of AR use in orthopaedic surgery before it is widely adopted into practice.

Indexed as

Augmented realityComputer-assisted surgeryInnovationReviewVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID34581989
PMCPMC8497656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.