Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34581900›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2021

Analysis of presacral tissue structure in LARS and the prevention of LARS by reconstruction of presacral mesorectum with pedicled greater omentum flap graft.

Linghou Meng, Haiquan Qin, Zigao Huang, Jiankun Liao, Jinghua Cai, Yan Feng, Shanshan Luo, Hao Lai, Weizhong Tang, Xianwei Mo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linghou Meng *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Haiquan Qin *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Zigao HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Jiankun LiaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Jinghua CaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Yan FengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Shanshan LuoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Hao LaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Weizhong TangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. tangweizhong@gxmu.edu.cn.
Xianwei MoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. moxianwei888@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7910-9556
Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

2019 Guangxi University High-level Innovation Team and the Project of Outstanding Scholars Program, and Guangxi Science and Technology Project 2019AC03004Guangxi Medical and Health Appropriate Technology Development and Promotion Application Project S2017098Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Project AD19245197Self-Financing Research Project of the Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Z2015607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe greater omentum has played a unique biological role in regenerative surgery. The aim of our study was to alter the anterior sacral structure by filling the anterior sacral space with the greater omentum and evaluate its effect on the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for low rectal cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively collected clinical data of patients with primary low rectal cancer who underwent TME and ileostomy closure in our hospital from March 2018 to March 2020. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to analyze the correlation between postoperative mesorectal fascia (MRF) thickness and LARS score. Subsequently, we prospectively used a tipped greater omental flap graft to reconstruct the anterior rectal sacral structures (MRF reconstruction) in 17 patients and compared LARS scores and rectal compliance (RC) at week 12 after closure of the ileostomy in both groups.

resultsThere were 47 patients with No-MRF reconstruction (31 males, mean age 60.68 ± 9.21 years) and 17 with MRF reconstruction (10 males, mean age 49.82 ± 14.74 years). Correlation analysis indicated that MRF thickness and RC were negatively correlated with LARS severity (p < 0.05). The LARS score of patients with MRF reconstruction at 12 weeks was significantly better than that of those with No-MRF reconstruction (32.97 ± 2.65 vs. 26.94 ± 1.52, p = 0.001), and the RC of MRF reconstruction were lower (2.80 ± 0.55 vs. 3.67 ± 0.38, p = 0.001). In addition, MRF reconstruction and No-MRF reconstruction have the similar incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.156). No hemorrhage or necrosis of the greater omentum flap was observed in any of the patients.

conclusionsGreater omentum flap transplantation can significantly improve the symptoms of LARS at 12 weeks after ileostomy closure and we expect it to become a new surgical procedure for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmentumRetrospective StudiesSyndromeLow anterior resection syndromeLow rectal cancerMesorectumOmental pedicle flap

Identifiers

PMID34581900
OpenAlexW3202618620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.