Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34581840›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Using adaptive psychophysics to identify the neural network reset time in subsecond interval timing.

Renata Sadibolova, Stella Sun, Devin B Terhune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Systematic errors in the perception of rhythm.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renata Sadibolova *Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE146NW, UK. r.sadibolova@gold.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-9973
Stella Sun *Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE146NW, UK.
Devin B TerhuneDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE146NW, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6792-4975

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R01583X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

State-dependent network models of sub-second interval timing propose that duration is encoded in states of neuronal populations that need to reset prior to a novel timing operation to maintain optimal timing performance. Previous research has shown that the approximate boundary of this reset interval can be inferred by varying the inter-stimulus interval between two to-be-timed intervals. However, the estimated boundary of this reset interval is broad (250-500 ms) and remains under-specified with implications for the characteristics of state-dependent network dynamics sub-serving interval timing. Here, we probed the interval specificity of this reset boundary by manipulating the inter-stimulus interval between standard and comparison intervals in two sub-second auditory duration discrimination tasks (100 and 200 ms) and a control (pitch) discrimination task using adaptive psychophysics. We found that discrimination thresholds improved with the introduction of a 333 ms inter-stimulus interval relative to a 250 ms inter-stimulus interval in both duration discrimination tasks, but not in the control task. This effect corroborates previous findings of a breakpoint in the discrimination performance for sub-second stimulus interval pairs as a function of an incremental inter-stimulus delay but more precisely localizes the minimal inter-stimulus delay range. These results suggest that state-dependent networks sub-serving sub-second timing require approximately 250-333 ms for the network to reset to maintain optimal interval timing.

Indexed as

Time PerceptionAuditory PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPsychophysicsAdaptive psychophysicsBreakpointState-dependent networkTemporal discriminationTime perception

Identifiers

PMID34581840
PMCPMC8599254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.