ArticleArchives of microbiology2021
Assessment of probiotic adhesion and inhibitory effect on Escherichia coli and Salmonella adhesion.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing Probiotic LAB and Bacteriocins for Clean-Label Food Processing and Biopreservation: Omics, Molecular Innovations and Industrial Applications.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Functional and Safety Profile ofPharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Advancements in fluorescent labeling in assessing the probiotic adhesion capacity - A review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Immunomodulatory Activity on Human Macrophages by Cell-Free Supernatants to Explore the Probiotic and Postbiotic Potential of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strains of Plant Origin.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2024Article
- Characterization of the Effects of a Novel Probiotic onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Isolation, identification, and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria with probiotic potential from traditional fermented sour meat.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Inflammatory Response: A Crucial Way for Gut Microbes to Regulate Cardiovascular Diseases.Nutrients · 2023Review
- The Antimicrobial Effect of Various Single-Strain and Multi-Strain Probiotics, Dietary Supplements or Other Beneficial Microbes against Common Clinical Wound Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Probiotic-Based Bacteriocin: Immunity Supplementation Against Viruses. An Updated Review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we screened bacterial strains to identify specific probiotics to treat pig diarrhea caused by Escherichia coli or Salmonella. The potential probiotics were assayed for their survival in gastrointestinal solution, their antimicrobial activity, cell-surface properties, adhesion to Caco-2 cells, and inhibition of pathogen adhesion. Nine out of the 20 strains tested showed high tolerance of a simulated gastrointestinal environment and six strains exerted antagonistic effects against enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium MQ. Lactobacillus johnsonii pDX1e exhibited a higher potent antibacterial activity. Four strains (pDX1a, pDX1e, pDX3a, and pDX5a) displayed auto-aggregation, hydrophobicity, and adhesion to Caco-2 cells similar to those of the reference strain Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG). Enterococcus durans pDX5a showed the highest adhesion capacity (13.86%), followed by the reference strain LGG (11.20%). All the tested strains competitively suppressed the attachment of pathogens to Caco-2 cells (by 30.73-55.18%); L. johnsonii pDX1e and Ent. durans pDX5a significantly inhibited the adhesion of pathogens by substitution and exclusion, respectively. Therefore, pDX1e and pDX5a were selected as probiotic strains for further investigation and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.