Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34581770›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2021

A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results.

Matthew A Petoe, Samuel A Titchener, Maria Kolic, William G Kentler, Carla J Abbott, David A X Nayagam, Elizabeth K Baglin, Jessica Kvansakul, Nick Barnes, Janine G Walker and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03406416 (Evaluation of a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03406416 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A 44 Channel Fully Implantable Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMobius Medical Pty Ltd.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled4ConditionsRetinitis Pigmentosa, ChoroideremiaArms44Ch Bionic Eye Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Motion perception with visual prostheses.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Restoration of Sight with Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Matthew A PetoeBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Samuel A TitchenerBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Maria KolicCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
William G KentlerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carla J AbbottCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David A X NayagamBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth K BaglinCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica KvansakulBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nick BarnesResearch School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Janine G WalkerResearch School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Stephanie B EppBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kiera A YoungCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lauren N AytonCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chi D LuuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Penelope J AllenCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To report the initial safety and efficacy results of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis at 56 weeks after device activation. Methods: Four subjects, with advanced retinitis pigmentosa and bare-light perception only, enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT03406416). A 44-channel electrode array was implanted in a suprachoroidal pocket. Device stability, efficacy, and adverse events were investigated at 12-week intervals. Results: All four subjects were implanted successfully and there were no device-related serious adverse events. Color fundus photography indicated a mild postoperative subretinal hemorrhage in two recipients, which cleared spontaneously within 2 weeks. Optical coherence tomography confirmed device stability and position under the macula. Screen-based localization accuracy was significantly better for all subjects with device on versus device off. Two subjects were significantly better with the device on in a motion discrimination task at 7, 15, and 30°/s and in a spatial discrimination task at 0.033 cycles per degree. All subjects were more accurate with the device on than device off at walking toward a target on a modified door task, localizing and touching tabletop objects, and detecting obstacles in an obstacle avoidance task. A positive effect of the implant on subjects' daily lives was confirmed by an orientation and mobility assessor and subject self-report. Conclusions: These interim study data demonstrate that the suprachoroidal prosthesis is safe and provides significant improvements in functional vision, activities of daily living, and observer-rated quality of life. Translational Relevance: A suprachoroidal prosthesis can provide clinically useful artificial vision while maintaining a safe surgical profile.

Indexed as

Retinitis PigmentosaVisual ProsthesisActivities of Daily LivingHumansQuality of LifeVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID34581770
PMCPMC8479573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.