Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34581599›Full record

ArticlemSystems2021

A Simple, Cost-Effective, and Automation-Friendly Direct PCR Approach for Bacterial Community Analysis.

Fangchao Song, Jennifer V Kuehl, Arjun Chandran, Adam P Arkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research progress on direct PCR and its applications.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of biopolymers, cork, andFrontiers in microbiomes · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Diverse Mycorrizal Morphology ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fangchao SongEnvironmental Genomics & Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Jennifer V KuehlEnvironmental Genomics & Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Arjun ChandranDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Adam P ArkinEnvironmental Genomics & Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC02-05CH1123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial communities in water, soil, and humans play an essential role in environmental ecology and human health. PCR-based amplicon analysis, such as 16S rRNA sequencing, is a fundamental tool for quantifying and studying microbial composition, dynamics, and interactions. However, given the complexity of microbial communities, a substantial number of samples becomes necessary for analyses that parse the factors that determine microbial composition. A common bottleneck in performing these kinds of experiments is genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction, which is time-consuming, expensive, and often biased based on the types of species present. Direct PCR method is a potentially simpler and more accurate alternative to gDNA extraction methods that do not require the intervening purification step. In this study, we evaluated three variations of direct PCR methods using diverse heterogeneous bacterial cultures, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, ZymoBIOMICS microbial community standards, and groundwater. By comparing direct PCR methods with DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kits for microbial isolates and DNeasy PowerSoil Kits for microbial communities, we found that a specific variant of the direct PCR method exhibits an overall efficiency comparable to that of the conventional DNeasy PowerSoil protocol in the circumstances we tested. We also found that the method showed higher efficiency for extracting gDNA from the Gram-negative strains compared to DNeasy Blood and Tissue protocol. This direct PCR method is 1,600 times less expensive ($0.34 for 96 samples) and 10 times simpler (15 min hands-on time for 96 samples) than the DNeasy PowerSoil protocol. The direct PCR method can also be fully automated and is compatible with small-volume samples, thereby permitting scaling of samples and replicates needed to support high-throughput large-scale bacterial community analysis.

Indexed as

16S rRNA sequencingmicrobial communities

Identifiers

PMID34581599
PMCPMC8547444
OpenAlexW3203023034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.