Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580873›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2022

Modeling food fortification contributions to micronutrient requirements in Malawi using Household Consumption and Expenditure Surveys.

Kevin Tang, Katherine P Adams, Elaine L Ferguson, Monica Woldt, Alexander A Kalimbira, Blessings Likoswe, Jennifer Yourkavitch, Benjamin Chrisinger, Sarah Pedersen, Lucia Segovia De La Revilla and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Folate and vitamin BBirth defects research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kevin TangDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2580-3726
Katherine P AdamsInstitute for Global Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-2473
Elaine L FergusonDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Monica WoldtUSAID Advancing Nutrition, Arlington, Virginia.
Alexander A KalimbiraDepartment of Human Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Food and Human Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Blessings LikosweDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Malawi, Chichiri, Malawi.
Jennifer YourkavitchUSAID Advancing Nutrition, Arlington, Virginia.
Benjamin ChrisingerDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah PedersenUSAID, Bureau for Resilience and Food Security, Washington, DC.
Lucia Segovia De La RevillaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Omar DaryUSAID, Bureau for Global Health, Washington, DC.
E Louise AnderSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Edward J M JoyDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale food fortification may be a cost-effective intervention to increase micronutrient supplies in the food system when implemented under appropriate conditions, yet it is unclear if current strategies can equitably benefit populations with the greatest micronutrient needs. This study developed a mathematical modeling framework for comparing fortification scenarios across different contexts. It was applied to model the potential contributions of three fortification vehicles (oil, sugar, and wheat flour) toward meeting dietary micronutrient requirements in Malawi through secondary data analyses of a Household Consumption and Expenditure Survey. We estimated fortification vehicle coverage, micronutrient density of the diet, and apparent intake of nonpregnant, nonlactating women for nine different micronutrients, under three food fortification scenarios and stratified by subpopulations across seasons. Oil and sugar had high coverage and apparent consumption that, when combined, were predicted to improve the vitamin A adequacy of the diet. Wheat flour contributed little to estimated dietary micronutrient supplies due to low apparent consumption. Potential contributions of all fortification vehicles were low in rural populations of the lowest socioeconomic position. While the model predicted large-scale food fortification would contribute to reducing vitamin A inadequacies, other interventions are necessary to meet other micronutrient requirements, especially for the rural poor.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedMicronutrientsModels, BiologicalNutritional RequirementsRural PopulationFemaleHumansMalawiMaleMicronutrientsequityHCESinadequacylarge-scale food fortificationMalawimicronutrient

Identifiers

PMID34580873
PMCPMC9291765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.