Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580785›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2021

Phenotypic characterization of cell-to-cell interactions between two yeast species during alcoholic fermentation.

Natasha Alethea Luyt, Sandra Beaufort, Benoit Divol, Mathabatha Evodia Setati, Patricia Taillandier, Florian Franz Bauer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Screening of wild-typeFood science and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Extracellular Metabolites fromMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natasha Alethea LuytDepartment of Viticulture and Oenology, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1204-0694
Sandra BeaufortINPT, UPS, Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université de Toulouse, 4, Allée Emile Monso, 31030, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-743X
Benoit DivolDepartment of Viticulture and Oenology, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1506-3170
Mathabatha Evodia SetatiDepartment of Viticulture and Oenology, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-009X
Patricia TaillandierINPT, UPS, Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université de Toulouse, 4, Allée Emile Monso, 31030, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-6490
Florian Franz BauerDepartment of Viticulture and Oenology, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa. fb2@sun.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5764-4542

Funding

national research foundation of south africa UID83471national research foundation of south africa UID85055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial multispecies ecosystems are responsible for many biotechnological processes and are particularly important in food production. In wine fermentations, in addition to the natural microbiota, several commercially relevant yeast species may be co-inoculated to achieve specific outcomes. However, such multispecies fermentations remain largely unpredictable because of multilevel interactions between naturally present and/or co-inoculated species. Understanding the nature of such interactions has therefore become essential for successful implementation of such strategies. Here we investigate interactions between strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans. Co-fermentations with both species sharing the same bioreactor (physical contact) were compared to co-fermentations with physical separation between the species in a membrane bioreactor ensuring free exchange of metabolites. Yeast culturability, viability and the production of core metabolites were monitored. The previously reported negative interaction between these two yeast species was confirmed. Physical contact greatly reduced the culturability and viability of L. thermotolerans and led to earlier cell death, compared to when these yeasts were co-fermenting without cell-cell contact. In turn, in the absence of cell-cell contact, L. thermotolerans metabolic activity led to an earlier decline in culturability in S. cerevisiae. Cell-cell contact did not result in significant differences in the major fermentation metabolites ethanol, acetic acid and lactic acid, but impacted on the production of some volatile compounds.

Indexed as

FermentationPhylogenyAcetic AcidBioreactorsCell CommunicationCoculture TechniquesEcosystemEthanolSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomycetalesVitisWineAcetic AcidEthanolCell–cell contactCo-culture fermentationsL. thermotoleransS. cerevisiaeYeast interactions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.