Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580774›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Laparoscopic creation of a retrosternal route for gastric conduit reconstruction.

Manabu Horikawa, Taro Oshikiri, Gosuke Takiguchi, Naoki Urakawa, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Masashi Yamamoto, Shingo Kanaji, Yoshiko Matsuda, Kimihiro Yamashita, Takeru Matsuda and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manabu HorikawaDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Taro OshikiriDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan. oshikiri@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-0635-3432
Gosuke TakiguchiDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Naoki UrakawaDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Hiroshi HasegawaDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Masashi YamamotoDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Shingo KanajiDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Yoshiko MatsudaDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Kimihiro YamashitaDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Takeru MatsudaDivision of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Tetsu NakamuraDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Satoshi SuzukiDivision of Community Medicine and Medical Network, Department of Social Community Medicine and Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Yoshihiro KakejiDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Kobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetrosternal reconstruction is associated with a lower risk of mediastinitis, gastro-tracheal fistula, and hiatal hernia. Historically, traumatic manual creation of the retrosternal tunnel has been performed using one's fist. We report a novel and atraumatic laparoscopic procedure to create the retrosternal route.

methodsWe have laparoscopically created the retrosternal route in 25 thoracoscopic, mediastinoscopic, or robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies since August 2019. Specifically, a peritoneal incision is started at the dorsal side of the xiphoid process. Through a 12-mm port inserted slightly to the right of and superior to the umbilical camera port, we dissect loose connective tissues from the caudal to the cranial side using behind the sternum and inside the internal thoracic vessels as landmarks. The time required to create the route was calculated. Then, the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method and the simple moving average of five cases were used to evaluate the learning curve of this novel procedure. Operative outcomes were analyzed according to the learning curve results and also compared with 25 cases of postmediastinal reconstruction counterparts.

resultsTwenty-five patients were divided into the early group (six patients) and late group (19 patients) based on the peak of the CUSUM chart. The time required for route creation was 28.5 min (median) in the early and 15 min in the late group, indicating a significant difference (P = 0.038). The overall incidence of pleural injury was 20% (5 of 25 patients), with no significant difference between the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications. Also, there were no significant differences in perioperative complications or gastric conduit functions 1 year after surgery between the retrosternal and the postmediastinal reconstruction.

conclusionLaparoscopic creation of a retrosternal route for gastric conduit reconstruction is safe and feasible and has a short learning curve.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyAnastomosis, SurgicalEsophagectomyHumansStomachGastric conduit reconstructionLearning curveMinimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE)Retrosternal routeRobot-assisted MIE (RAMIE)

Identifiers

PMID34580774
OpenAlexW3204599783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.