ArticleArchives of dermatological research2022
Financial burden and impact of atopic dermatitis out-of-pocket healthcare expenses among black individuals in the United States.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variations in Healthcare Provider Interactions and Treatment Satisfaction by Patient Race and Ethnicity: A Survey of Adults with Atopic Dermatitis.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Real-World Use of Abrocitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in the United States Based on Electronic Health Records and Administrative Claims.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Atopic dermatitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Paving the Way to Healthcare Equity: A Comprehensive Review of Care Gaps and Emerging Initiatives in Dermatology.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Moving beyond biology: the critical role of social and structural determinants in atopic dermatitis.International journal of dermatology · 2025Review
- Special Considerations of Atopic Dermatitis in Skin of Color.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Atopic Dermatitis Across Shades of Skin.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023Review
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Treatment Characteristics Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis in the United States and Canada: Real-World Data from the CorEvitas Atopic Dermatitis Registry.Dermatology and therapy · 2023Article
- The Imprint of Exposome on the Development of Atopic Dermatitis across the Lifespan: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The financial burden of out-of-pocket healthcare expenses on caregivers of children with atopic dermatitis in the United States.Skin health and disease · 2023Article
- Atopic Dermatitis Polypharmacy and Out-Of-Pocket Healthcare Expenses.Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD · 2023Article
- The ICER review is in: hope amidst uncertainty.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2022Article
- Impact of Financial Burden on Family Caregivers of Older Adults Using Long-Term Care Insurance Services.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Black race is associated with increased atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and healthcare resource utilization. However, the burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses among black individuals with AD is not well understood. We sought to characterize the categories and impact of OOP healthcare expenses associated with AD management among black individuals. A 25-question voluntary online survey was administered to National Eczema Association members (N = 113,502). Inclusion criteria (US residents age ≥ 18 years; self-report of AD or primary caregivers of individuals with AD) was met by 77.3% (1118/1447) of respondents. Black individuals with AD were younger, had lower household income, Medicaid, urban residence, poor AD control and frequent skin infections (P ≤ 0.02). Blacks vs. non-blacks reported more OOP costs for prescription medications covered (74.2% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.04) and not covered (65.1% vs. 46.5%, P = 0.0004) by insurance, emergency room visits (22.1% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.005), and outpatient laboratory testing (33.3% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.01). Black race was associated with increased household financial impact from OOP expenses (P = 0.0009), and predictors of financial impact included minimally controlled AD (adjusted OR [95% CI] 13.88 [1.63-117.96], P = 0.02), systemic therapy (4.34 [1.63-11.54], 0.003), > $200 monthly OOP expenses (14.28 [3.42-59.60], P = 0.0003), and Medicaid (4.02 [1.15-14.07], P = 0.03). Blacks with Medicaid had higher odds of harmful financial impact (3.32 [1.77-6.24], P = 0.0002) than those of black race (1.81 [1.04-3.15], P = 0.04) or with Medicaid (1.39 [1.02-1.88], P = 0.04) alone. Black race is associated with increased OOP costs for AD and significant household financial impact. Targeted interventions are needed to address financial disparities in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.