Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580704›Full record

ArticleBJS open2021

Role of delay and antibiotics on PERForation rate while waiting appendicECTomy (PERFECT): a protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial.

K Jalava, V Sallinen, H Lampela, H Malmi, A Leppäniemi, P Mentula

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04378868 (Role of Delay and Antibiotics on PERForation Rate While Waiting appendECTomy - Randomized Non-inferiority Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04378868 phase4completednot on this map

Role of Delay and Antibiotics on PERForation Rate While Waiting appendECTomy - Randomized Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled1,800ConditionsAppendicitisArmsAntibiotics, cefuroxime and metronidazole, No antibiotics, urgent schedule, less urgent schedule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Focus on identifying and closing knowledge gaps in acute appendicitis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K JalavaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8990-1088
V SallinenDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
H LampelaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
H MalmiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
A LeppäniemiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
P MentulaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6516-3797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLonger duration from symptom onset is associated with increased risk of perforation in appendicitis. In previous studies, in-hospital delay to surgery has had conflicting effects on perforation rates. Although preoperative antibiotics have been shown to reduce postoperative infections, there are no data showing that administration of antibiotics while waiting for surgery has any benefits. The aims of this study are to evaluate the role of both in-hospital delay to surgery and antibiotic treatment while waiting for surgery on the rate of appendiceal perforation.

methodsThis prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial compares the in-hospital delay to surgery of less than 8 hours versus less than 24 hours in adult patients with predicted uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Additionally, participants are randomized either to receive or not to receive antibiotics while waiting for surgery. The primary study endpoint is the rate of perforated appendicitis discovered during appendicectomy. The aim is to randomize 1800 patients, that is estimated to give a power of 90 per cent (χ2) for the non-inferiority margin of 5 percentage points for both layers (urgency and preoperative antibiotic). Secondary endpoints include length of hospital stay, 30-day complications graded using Clavien-Dindo classification, preoperative pain, conversion rate, histopathological diagnosis and Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System classification. DISCUSSION: There are no previous randomized controlled studies for either in-hospital delay or preoperative antibiotic treatment. The trial will yield new level 1 evidence.EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT Number: 2019-002348-26; registration number: NCT04378868 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAppendicitisAdultAppendectomyEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansLength of StayProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34580704
PMCPMC8477049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.