Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580675›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2021

Dichotomy between the humoral and cellular responses elicited by mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.

Rahul Ukey, Natalie Bruiners, Hridesh Mishra, Pankaj K Mishra, Deborah McCloskey, Alberta Onyuka, Fei Chen, Abraham Pinter, Daniela Weiskopf, Alessandro Sette and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rahul UkeyPublic Health Research Institute, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
Natalie BruinersPublic Health Research Institute, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
Hridesh MishraPublic Health Research Institute, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
Pankaj K MishraPublic Health Research Institute, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
Deborah McCloskeyClinical Research Center, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Alberta OnyukaGlobal Tuberculosis Institute, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
Fei ChenClinical Research Center, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Abraham PinterPublic Health Research Institute, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
Daniela WeiskopfCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA.
Alessandro SetteCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA.
Jason RoyDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Sunanda GaurDepartment of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Maria Laura GennaroPublic Health Research Institute, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.

Funding

New Jersey Alliance for Clinical Translational Science: NJ ACTSUL1TR003017 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$28.9M
Microbial, immune, metabolic perturbations by antibiotics (MIME study)U01AI122285 · NIAID · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MARTIN J BLASER, Steven M Holland · 2016 to 2026
$5.2M
Foam cells as drug targets in tuberculosisR01HL149450 · NHLBI · RBHS-NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI GENNARO, MARIA LAURA, KARAKOUSIS, PETROS C · 2019 to 2022
$3.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003017NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149450NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI122285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protection from severe disease and hospitalization by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been amply demonstrated by real-world data. However, the rapidly evolving pandemic raises new concerns. One pertains efficacy of adenoviral vector-based vaccines, particularly the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S, relative to mRNA vaccines. We investigated the immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S and mRNA vaccines in 33 subjects vaccinated with either vaccine class five months earlier on average. After controlling for time since vaccination, Spike-binding antibody and neutralizing antibody levels were higher in the mRNA-vaccinated subjects, while no significant differences in antigen-specific B cell and T cell responses were observed between the two groups. Thus, a dichotomy exists between humoral and cellular responses elicited by the two vaccine classes. Our results have implications for the need of booster doses in vaccinated subjects and might explain the dichotomy reported between the waning protection from symptomatic infection by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and its persisting efficacy in preventing hospitalization and death.

Identifiers

PMID34580675
PMCPMC8475964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.