Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580643›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2021

Non-Visit-Based and Non-Infection-Related Antibiotic Use in the US: A Cohort Study of Privately Insured Patients During 2016-2018.

Michael A Fischer, Mufaddal Mahesri, Joyce Lii, Jeffrey A Linder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael A FischerDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4685-164X
Mufaddal MahesriDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joyce LiiDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey A LinderDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

The Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC) at Northwestern UniversityP30AG059988 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ACKERMANN, RONALD T. · 2020 to 2024
$7.1M
ToolBox Detect: Low Cost Detection of Cognitive Decline in Primary Care SettingsR01AG069762 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD, NOWINSKI, CINDY J. · 2020 to 2025
$6.4M
Use of Behavioral Economics in Repeat SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Disadvantaged CommunitiesR33AG057395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DOCTOR, JASON N., SULLIVAN, MARK D · 2019 to 2021
$3.3M
Behavioral Economics Applications to Geriatrics Leveraging EHRs (BEAGLE)R33AG057383 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PERSELL, STEPHEN · 2019 to 2021
$2.1M
AHRQ HHS HHSP233201500020IAHRQ HHS R01 HS024930AHRQ HHS R01 HS026506AHRQ HHS R01 HS028127NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059988NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069762NIA NIH HHS R33 AG057383NIA NIH HHS R33 AG057395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulatory antibiotic prescriptions without a clinic visit or without documentation of infection could represent overuse and contribute to adverse outcomes. We aim to describe US ambulatory antibiotic prescribing, including those without an associated visit or infection diagnosis.

methodsWe conducted an observational cohort study using data of all patients receiving antibacterial, antibiotic prescriptions from 04/01/2016 to 06/30/2018 in a large US private health insurance plan. We identified outpatient antibiotic prescriptions as (1) associated with a clinician visit and an infection-related diagnosis; (2) associated with a clinician visit but no infection-related diagnosis; or (3) not associated with an in-person clinician visit in the 7 days before the prescription (non-visit-based). We then assessed whether non-visit-based antibiotic prescriptions (NVBAPs) differed from visit-based antibiotics by patient, clinician, or antibiotic characteristics using multivariable models.

resultsThe cohort included 8.6M enrollees who filled 22.3M antibiotic prescriptions. NVBAP accounted for 31% (6.9M) of fills, and non-infection-related prescribing accounted for 22% (4.9M). NVBAP rates were lower for children than for adults (0-17 years old, 16%; 18-64 years old, 33%; >65 years old, 34%). Among most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes, NVBAP was highest for penicillins (36%) and lowest for cephalosporins (25%) and macrolides (25%). Specialist physicians had the highest rate of NVBAP (38%), followed by internists (28%), family medicine (20%), and pediatricians (10%). In multivariable models, NVBAP was associated with increasing age, and NVBAP was less likely for patients in the South, those with more baseline clinical visits, or those with chronic lung disease.

conclusionsOver half of ambulatory antibiotic use was either non-visit-based or non-infection-related. Particularly given health care changes due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, efforts to improve antibiotic prescribing must account for non-visit-based and non-infection-related prescribing.

Indexed as

antibiotic prescribingquality of prescribingvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID34580643
PMCPMC8436380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.