ReviewMicrofluidics and nanofluidics2021
Methods and platforms for analysis of nucleic acids from single-cell based on microfluidics.
Review in Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Cellular Heterogeneity with Microfluidic Single-Cell Secretion Analysis Tools.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Open and closed microfluidics for biosensing.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Antibodies, repertoires and microdevices in antibody discovery and characterization.Lab on a chip · 2024Review
- Digital PCR for Single-Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Micromixing within microfluidic devices: Fundamentals, design, and fabrication.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
- Microfluidic design in single-cell sequencing and application to cancer precision medicine.Cell reports methods · 2023Review
- Droplets microfluidics platform-A tool for single cell research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Review
- Review
- Microbial Single-Cell Analysis: What Can We Learn From Mammalian?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell nucleic acid analysis aims at discovering the genetic differences between individual cells which is well known as the cellular heterogeneity. This technology facilitates cancer diagnosis, stem cell research, immune system analysis, and other life science applications. The conventional platforms for single-cell nucleic acid analysis more rely on manual operation or bulky devices. Recently, the emerging microfluidic technology has provided a perfect platform for single-cell nucleic acid analysis with the characteristic of accurate and automatic single-cell manipulation. In this review, we briefly summarized the procedure of single-cell nucleic acid analysis including single-cell isolation, single-cell lysis, nucleic acid amplification, and genetic analysis. And then, three representative microfluidic platforms for single-cell nucleic acid analysis are concluded as valve-, microwell-, and droplet-based platforms. Furthermore, we described the state-of-the-art integrated single-cell nucleic acid analysis systems based on the three platforms. Finally, the future development and challenges of microfluidics-based single-cell nucleic acid analysis are discussed as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.