Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580545›Full record

ArticleBiological conservation2021

COVID-19 related travel restrictions prevented numerous wildlife deaths on roads: A comparative analysis of results from 11 countries.

Michal Bíl, Richard Andrášik, Vojtěch Cícha, Amir Arnon, Maris Kruuse, Jochen Langbein, András Náhlik, Milla Niemi, Boštjan Pokorny, Victor J Colino-Rabanal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological conservation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michal BílCDV Transport Research Centre, Lisenska 33a, Brno 636 00, Czechia.
Richard AndrášikCDV Transport Research Centre, Lisenska 33a, Brno 636 00, Czechia.
Vojtěch CíchaCDV Transport Research Centre, Lisenska 33a, Brno 636 00, Czechia.
Amir ArnonDepartment of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology and the Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Maris KruuseDepartment of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia.
Jochen LangbeinLangbein Wildlife Associates, Greenleas, Chapel Cleeve, Minehead TA24 6HY, United Kingdom.
András NáhlikInstitute of Wildlife Management and Vertebrate Zoology, University of Sopron, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Sopron H-9400, Hungary.
Milla NiemiMetsähallitus Wildlife Service Finland, Pohjoispuisto 7, FI-28100 Pori, Finland.
Boštjan PokornyEnvironmental Protection College, Trg mladosti 7, 3320 Velenje, Slovenia.
Victor J Colino-RabanalSection of Zoology, Department of Animal Biology, Parasitology, Ecology, Soil Science and Agrochemistry, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37071 Salamanca, Spain.
Christer M RolandsenNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, NO-7485, Trondheim, Norway.
Andreas SeilerSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SLU; Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, 73091 Riddarhyttan, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of wild animals are killed annually on roads worldwide. During spring 2020, the volume of road traffic was reduced globally as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. We gathered data on wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC) from Czechia, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Israel, Norway, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and for Scotland and England within the United Kingdom. In all studied countries WVC statistics tend to be dominated by large mammals (various deer species and wild boar), while information on smaller mammals as well as birds are less well recorded. The expected number of WVC for 2020 was predicted on the basis of 2015-2019 WVC time series representing expected WVC numbers under normal traffic conditions. Then, the forecasted and reported WVC data were compared. The results indicate varying levels of WVC decrease between countries during the COVID-19 related traffic flow reduction (CRTR). While no significant change was determined in Sweden, where the state-wide response to COVID-19 was the least intensive, a decrease as marked as 37.4% was identified in Estonia. The greatest WVC decrease, more than 40%, was determined during the first weeks of CRTR for Estonia, Spain, Israel, and Czechia. Measures taken during spring 2020 allowed the survival of large numbers of wild animals which would have been killed under normal traffic conditions. The significant effects of even just a few weeks of reduced traffic, help to highlight the negative impacts of roads on wildlife mortality and the need to boost global efforts of wildlife conservation, including systematic gathering of roadkill data.

Indexed as

COVID-19 lockdownMesocarnivoresTraffic flowUngulatesWildlife crash reporting systemsWildlife-vehicle collisions

Identifiers

PMID34580545
PMCPMC8457751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.