Observational studyScientific reports2021
A comparison of head movements tests in force plate and accelerometer based posturography in patients with balance problems due to vestibular dysfunction.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validity of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Postural Sway Analysis: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Translational insights into pain mechanisms and balance impairments in aging: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Romberg Test for Assessing Adults With Vestibular Hypofunction.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024Article
- Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Measurements in Patients with Peripheral Vestibular Dysfunctions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Head movement kinematics are altered during balance stability exercises in individuals with vestibular schwannoma.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Virtual Reality-A Supplement to Posturography or a Novel Balance Assessment Tool?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Critical evaluation of the benefits and limitations of foam posturography in vestibular disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares HS posturography on inertial sensors (MediPost) with force platform posturography in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction. The study group included 38 patients (age 50.6; SD 11.6) with unilateral vestibular weakness (UV) and 65 healthy volunteers (48.7; SD 11.5). HS tests were performed simultaneously on the force plate and with MediPost sensor attached at L4. Four conditions applied: eyes open/closed, firm/foam. The tests were performed twice, with the head moving at the frequency of 0.3 Hz (HS 0.3) and 0.6 Hz (HS 0.6). Mean sway velocity was significantly lower for MediPost than force plate in 4th condition both in UV and healthy group. For HS 0.3 the differences between devices were marginal; the highest sensitivity (87%) and specificity (95%) were in 4th condition. For HS 0.6 MediPost revealed lower sensitivity than force plate although the surface parameter improved results. MediPost IMU device and force platform posturography revealed a similar ability to differentiate between patients with balance problems in course of vestibular pathology and healthy participants, despite the differences observed between measuring methods. In some tests surface parameter may be more appropriate than sway velocity in improving MediPost sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.