Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580286›Full record

ArticleCell death discovery2021

Epigenetic derepression converts PPARγ into a druggable target in triple-negative and endocrine-resistant breast cancers.

Ser Yue Loo, Nicholas L Syn, Angele Pei-Fern Koh, Janet Cheng-Fei Teng, Amudha Deivasigamani, Tuan Zea Tan, Aye Aye Thike, Shireen Vali, Shweta Kapoor, Xiaoyuan Wang and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death discovery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Demystifying the Functional Role of Nuclear Receptors in Esophageal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ser Yue Loo *Cancer Science Institute of Singapore and Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nicholas L Syn *Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6343-176X
Angele Pei-Fern KohCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Janet Cheng-Fei TengDepartment of Anatomy, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Amudha DeivasigamaniDivision of Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tuan Zea TanCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-1593
Aye Aye ThikeDepartment of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Shireen ValiCellworks Research India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
Shweta KapoorCellworks Research India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
Xiaoyuan WangDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jiong Wei WangDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-6082
Puay Hoon TanDepartment of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
George W YipDepartment of Anatomy, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Gautam SethiDepartment of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ruby Yun-Ju HuangSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kam Man HuiDivision of Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-1399
Lingzhi WangCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Boon Cher GohCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4107-102X
Alan Prem KumarCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. apkumar@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3754-5712
National University of Singapore · SGCellworks Research (India) · INNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore (MOE) MOE-T2EP30120-0016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials repurposing peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) agonists as anticancer agents have exhibited lackluster efficacy across a variety of tumor types. Here, we report that increased PPARG expression is associated with a better prognosis but is anticorrelated with histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 and 2 expressions. We show that HDAC overexpression blunts anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic responses to PPARγ agonists via transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms, however, these can be neutralized with clinically approved and experimental HDAC inhibitors. Supporting this notion, concomitant treatment with HDAC inhibitors was required to license the tumor-suppressive effects of PPARγ agonists in triple-negative and endocrine-refractory breast cancer cells, and combination therapy also restrained angiogenesis in a tube formation assay. This combination was also synergistic in estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα)-positive cells because HDAC blockade abrogated ERα interference with PPARγ-regulated transcription. Following a pharmacokinetics optimization study, the combination of rosiglitazone and a potent pan-HDAC inhibitor, LBH589, stalled disease progression in a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer greater than either of the monotherapies, while exhibiting a favorable safety profile. Our findings account for historical observations of de-novo resistance to PPARγ agonist monotherapy and propound a therapeutically cogent intervention against two aggressive breast cancer subtypes.

Identifiers

PMID34580286
PMCPMC8476547
OpenAlexW3202225803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.