Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34580210›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Indigenous knowledge and the shackles of wilderness.

Michael-Shawn Fletcher, Rebecca Hamilton, Wolfram Dressler, Lisa Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Managed retreat and planned retreat: a systematic literature review.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Conceptualizing social risk in relation to climate change and assisted ecosystem adaptation.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  15. The scope of empowerment for conservation and communities.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Whose conservation, revisited: how a focus on people-nature relationships spotlights new directions for conservation science.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Shifting paradigms and creating space for Indigenous leadership in biosecurity management and decision-making.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael-Shawn FletcherSchool of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; michael.fletcher@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1854-5629
Rebecca HamiltonAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Wolfram DresslerSchool of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Lisa PalmerSchool of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3571-5404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environmental crises currently gripping the Earth have been codified in a new proposed geological epoch: the Anthropocene. This epoch, according to the Anthropocene Working Group, began in the mid-20th century and reflects the "great acceleration" that began with industrialization in Europe [J. Zalasiewicz et al.,

Indexed as

KnowledgeWildernessConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansIndigenous PeoplesconservationIndigenous and local ecological knowledgerethinking wildernesstropical forest

Identifiers

PMID34580210
PMCPMC8501882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.