ArticleBJGP open2021
Transient elastography in patients at risk of liver fibrosis in primary care: a follow-up study over 54 months.
Article in BJGP open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The global epidemiology of alcohol-associated liver disease.Hepatology communications · 2026Review
- An Assessment of the Feasibility, Patient Acceptance, and Performance of Point-of-Care Transient Elastography for Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Performance of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score, Comparison with Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography Data, and Development of a Simple Algorithm to Predict Significant Liver Fibrosis in a Community-based Liver Service: A Retrospective Evaluation.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023Article
- To scan or not to scan: Use of transient elastography in an integrated health system.World journal of hepatology · 2023Article
- Noninvasive serum biomarkers for liver fibrosis in NAFLD: current and future.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023Review
- Recent advances in NAFLD: current areas of contention.Faculty reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiver fibrosis assessment services using transient elastography are growing in primary care. These services identify patients requiring specialist referral for liver fibrosis, and provide an opportunity for recommending lifestyle change. However, there are uncertainties regarding service design, effectiveness of advice given, and frequency of follow-up.
aimTo assess the following: (a) effectiveness of standard care lifestyle advice for weight management and alcohol consumption; (b) uptake for liver rescan; and (c) usefulness of a 4.5-year time interval of rescanning in monitoring progression of liver fibrosis. DESIGN &
settingAnalysis of patient outcomes 4.5 years after the first 'liver service' attendance that included transient elastography in five GP practices in Southampton, UK.
methodOutcomes included weight, alcohol consumption, rescan uptake, time interval between scans, and change in liver fibrosis stage.
resultsA total of 401 participants were recontacted. Mean standard deviation (± SD) weight loss was 1.2 kg±8.4 kg (
conclusionRescan recall attendance and adherence to lifestyle changes needs improving. Optimum time interval between scans remains uncertain. After a mean interval of 53.6 months between scans, and with no specific predictors indicated, a substantial minority (18.7%) experienced a deterioration in fibrosis grade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.