Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579777›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Single-colony sequencing reveals microbe-by-microbiome phylosymbiosis between the cyanobacterium Microcystis and its associated bacteria.

Olga M Pérez-Carrascal, Nicolas Tromas, Yves Terrat, Elisa Moreno, Alessandra Giani, Laisa Corrêa Braga Marques, Nathalie Fortin, B Jesse Shapiro

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microcystin shapes theISME communications · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olga M Pérez-Carrascal *Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université́ de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. olga.maria.perez-carrascal@umontreal.ca.
Nicolas Tromas *Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université́ de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. nicolas.tromas@umontreal.ca.
Yves TerratDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université́ de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Elisa MorenoDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université́ de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Alessandra GianiFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Laisa Corrêa Braga MarquesFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nathalie FortinNational Research Council of Canada, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
B Jesse ShapiroDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université́ de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. jesse.shapiro@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCyanobacteria from the genus Microcystis can form large mucilaginous colonies with attached heterotrophic bacteria-their microbiome. However, the nature of the relationship between Microcystis and its microbiome remains unclear. Is it a long-term, evolutionarily stable association? Which partners benefit? Here we report the genomic diversity of 109 individual Microcystis colonies-including cyanobacteria and associated bacterial genomes-isolated in situ and without culture from Lake Champlain, Canada and Pampulha Reservoir, Brazil.

resultsWe identified 14 distinct Microcystis genotypes from Canada, of which only two have been previously reported, and four genotypes specific to Brazil. Microcystis genetic diversity was much greater between than within colonies, consistent with colony growth by clonal expansion rather than aggregation of Microcystis cells. We also identified 72 bacterial species in the microbiome. Each Microcystis genotype had a distinct microbiome composition, and more closely related genotypes had more similar microbiomes. This pattern of phylosymbiosis could be explained by co-phylogeny in only two out of the nine most prevalent associated bacterial genera, Roseomonas and Rhodobacter. These phylogenetically associated genera could enrich the metabolic repertoire of Microcystis, for example by encoding the biosynthesis of complementary carotenoid molecules. In contrast, other colony-associated bacteria showed weaker signals of co-phylogeny, but stronger evidence of horizontal gene transfer with Microcystis. These observations suggest that acquired genes are more likely to be retained in both partners (Microcystis and members of its microbiome) when they are loosely associated, whereas one gene copy is sufficient when the association is physically tight and evolutionarily long-lasting.

conclusionsWe have introduced a method for culture-free isolation of single colonies from nature followed by metagenomic sequencing, which could be applied to other types of microbes. Together, our results expand the known genetic diversity of both Microcystis and its microbiome in natural settings, and support their long-term, specific, and potentially beneficial associations. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaMicrobiotaMicrocystisLakesPhylogenyCo-phylogenyCyanobacteriaMicrobiomeMicrocystisPhycospherePhylosymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID34579777
PMCPMC8477515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.