Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579559›Full record

ArticleCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2022

Migraine evolution after the cessation of CGRP(-receptor) antibody prophylaxis: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study.

Bianca Raffaelli, Maria Terhart, Lucas Hendrik Overeem, Jasper Mecklenburg, Lars Neeb, Maureen Steinicke, Uwe Reuter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Drugs for Migraine Prophylaxis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bianca RaffaelliDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9758-1494
Maria TerhartDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lucas Hendrik OvereemDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2057-7184
Jasper MecklenburgDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0777-0038
Lars NeebDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Maureen SteinickeDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Uwe ReuterDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8527-0725
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational and international guidelines recommend stopping migraine prophylaxis with CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies after 6-12 months of successful therapy. In this study, we aimed to analyze the course of migraine for four months after the cessation of CGRP(-receptor) antibodies use.

methodsThis longitudinal cohort study included patients with migraine who received a CGRP-(receptor) antibody for ≥8 months before treatment cessation. We analyzed headache data in the four-week period prior to mAb treatment initiation (baseline), in the month before the last mAb injection, in weeks 5-8 and 13-16 after last treatment. Primary endpoint of the study was the change of monthly migraine days from the month before last treatment to weeks 13-16. Secondary endpoints were changes in monthly headache days and monthly days with acute medication use.

resultsA total of 62 patients equally distributed between prophylaxis with the CGRP-receptor antibody erenumab and the CGRP antibodies galcanezumab or fremanezumab participated in the study. Patients reported 8.2 ± 6.6 monthly migraine days in the month before last treatment. Monthly migraine days gradually increased to 10.3 ± 6.8 in weeks 5-8 (p = 0.001) and to 12.5 ± 6.6 in weeks 13-16 (p < 0.001) after drug cessation. Monthly migraine days in weeks 13-16 were not different from baseline values (-0.8 ± 5.4; p > 0.999). Monthly headache days and monthly days with acute medication use showed a similar pattern.

conclusionsThe cessation of CGRP(-receptor) antibodies migraine prophylaxis was associated with a significant increase of migraine frequency and acute medication intake over time.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalMigraine DisordersHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCGRPdiscontinuationMigrainemonoclonal antibodies

Identifiers

PMID34579559
PMCPMC8988461
OpenAlexW3201983205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.