Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579278›Full record

ReviewVaccines2021

A Novel Approach against

Keila Y Acevedo-Villanueva, Gabriel O Akerele, Walid Ghazi Al Hakeem, Sankar Renu, Revathi Shanmugasundaram, Ramesh K Selvaraj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Design of an oral vaccine againstThe veterinary quarterly · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protection AgainstVaccines · 2026
    Article
  6. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Mini-Review on Multi-Hurdle Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Pre-Harvest Non-TyphoidalAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  14. Practical Preventive Considerations for Reducing the Public Health Burden of Poultry-Related Salmonellosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Prevention and Control of HumanInternational journal of food science · 2023
    Review
  20. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Keila Y Acevedo-VillanuevaDepartment of Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Gabriel O AkereleDepartment of Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0111-3926
Walid Ghazi Al HakeemDepartment of Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Sankar RenuUpkara Inc., 45145 W 12 Mile Rd, Novi, MI 48377, USA.
Revathi ShanmugasundaramUSDA-ARS, Toxicology and Mycotoxins Research Unit, Athens, GA 30605, USA.
Ramesh K SelvarajDepartment of Poultry Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work discusses the present-day limitations of current commercial

Indexed as

broilerslayersnanoparticlespolymericpoultrySalmonellavaccines

Identifiers

PMID34579278
PMCPMC8470574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.