Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579223›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Multiepitope Proteins for the Differential Detection of IgG Antibodies against RBD of the Spike Protein and Non-RBD Regions of SARS-CoV-2.

Larissa R Gomes, Andressa M Durans, Paloma Napoleão-Pêgo, Jessica A Waterman, Mariana S Freitas, Nathalia B R De Sá, Lilian V Pereira, Jéssica S Furtado, Romário G Aquino, Mario C R Machado and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Larissa R GomesFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7194-0858
Andressa M DuransFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Paloma Napoleão-PêgoFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Jessica A WatermanFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Mariana S FreitasFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Nathalia B R De SáAIDS & Molecular Immunology Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1084-6435
Lilian V PereiraAngra dos Reis Health Department, Angra dos Reis 23906-10, Brazil.
Jéssica S FurtadoAngra dos Reis Health Department, Angra dos Reis 23906-10, Brazil.
Romário G AquinoAngra dos Reis Health Department, Angra dos Reis 23906-10, Brazil.
Mario C R MachadoAngraLab Laboratory, Angra dos Reis 23946-010, Brazil.
Natalia Fintelman-RodriguesFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2332-8338
Thiago M L SouzaFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Carlos M MorelFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
David W ProvanceFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-0672
Salvatore G De-SimoneFIOCRUZ, Center of Technological Development in Health (CDTS)/National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Neglected Population Diseases (INCT-IDPN), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-656X
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

Brazilian Council for Scientific Research/CNPq #467.488.2014-2 to S.G.D-S and #301744/2019-0 to C.M.MCarlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janei-ro/FAPERJ (# 201.841-2018 to S.G.D-S. and # 732 E-26 110.198-13 to C.M.M.)FIOCRUZ/INOVA #VPPCB-007FIO-18-2-27-21 and #VPPIS-005FIO-20-2-51 to S.G.D-S; VVPCB-005-FIO-20-2-26 to D.W.P-Jr; INOVA B3-Bovespa
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the extent of global connectivity and collective vulnerability to emerging diseases. From its suspected origins in Wuhan, China, it spread to all corners of the world in a matter of months. The absence of high-performance, rapid diagnostic methods that could identify asymptomatic carriers contributed to its worldwide transmission. Serological tests offer numerous benefits compared to other assay platforms to screen large populations. First-generation assays contain targets that represent proteins from SARS-CoV-2. While they could be quickly produced, each actually has a mixture of specific and non-specific epitopes that vary in their reactivity for antibodies. To generate the next generation of the assay, epitopes were identified in three SARS-Cov-2 proteins (S, N, and Orf3a) by SPOT synthesis analysis. After their similarity to other pathogen sequences was analyzed, 11 epitopes outside of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein that showed high reactivity and uniqueness to the virus. These were incorporated into a ß-barrel protein core to create a highly chimeric protein. Another de novo protein was designed that contained only epitopes in the RBD. In-house ELISAs suggest that both multiepitope proteins can serve as targets for high-performance diagnostic tests. Our approach to bioengineer chimeric proteins is highly amenable to other pathogens and immunological uses.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19de novo designIgGlinear B cell epitopesSARS-CoV-2serodiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID34579223
PMCPMC8473315
OpenAlexW3196340110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.